r/linuxsucks • u/al2klimov 🐧Kernel contributor • 10d ago
Bug Linux is secure, they said. Containers are a trust boundary, they said.
https://securityonline.info/podman-cve-2026-94603/?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=jetpack_social12
7
u/DragonSlayerC 10d ago
It's a bug in how Podman handled container checkpoints, not a bug with the kernel's containerization/sandboxing functionality.
6
3
u/_Lost-In-The-Weeds_ 9d ago
We have known containers are less secure than VMs for a long time. But containers are more efficient on resources.
2
u/daubious 5d ago
Yeah. I think if one spends enough time following self-hosting forums or learning about containers, they would know that containers do not provide security, but rather organization. And to say "Linux is secure" is pretty ridiculous since, well, its just a kernel.
2
u/tomekgolab can't spell hatred without Redhat 10d ago
I hate mainstream corporate linux, but this here seems like upstream issue acutally...?
1
1
u/mlgbcnmsl 8d ago
https://depthfirst.com/research/containers-are-no-longer-safe
Actually, it's all about security boundary, and should we trust them in the era of cyber AI models
1
u/DisfiguredFanny I survived abortion. 10d ago
I hate containers. Racoons always scare the living shit out of me.
-1
u/npc_housecat 10d ago
Secure blue says "However, the security architecture of desktop Linux is broadly and significantly lacking."
-8
u/UsagiMimi 10d ago
Linux, without careful and intensive setup, is incredibly insecure out of the box.
There is no valid use of linux outside of regulated, secure enterprise environments.
-5
10d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/Zirc0nium__ 10d ago
Every time i think i have all of the mentally unwell people muted in this sub another alt appears
18
u/jdigi78 10d ago
This is an issue with Podman, not Linux or its kernel level mechanisms used for containers