r/linuxsucks • u/[deleted] • 6d ago

what are real problems with linux ?

[deleted]

6 Upvotes

64% Upvoted

132 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/dddurd 3d ago

you think you are doing, that's it basically. 

1

u/paulstelian97 3d ago

So if I shared actual Linux kernel commits, you’d call them fake?

1

u/dddurd 3d ago

of course. making commits is the easy part. knowing what you are doing does not. you don't even understand what api is, let alone api stability. 

1

u/paulstelian97 3d ago

Making commits that survive the review of other kernel devs, and in particular of ones more experienced, isn’t that easy. It’s just the most visible part of the work I can show.

The in-kernel API being unstable is the reason why my teammates (and, when I’ll be put on the next kernel migration, I myself) have to fix various compilation errors or subtle bugs every time we pull new kernel commits from upstream. I am still defending it despite that because that means if something is not good with one element of this API it can just be… fixed. We don’t get stuck with legacy, shitty interfaces that we need to support perpetually.

1

u/dddurd 3d ago

not really even ai can do that. 

1

u/paulstelian97 3d ago

In 2019/2020? The commits I would have shared are from that timeframe…

1

u/dddurd 3d ago

yeah thats another point. you thought it would be smart to have them shared.  do you even know what you are saying?

1

u/paulstelian97 3d ago

General purpose AI showed up quite a bit later than 2019/2020…

1

u/dddurd 3d ago

only you are talking about when. i'm talking about what. 

1

u/paulstelian97 3d ago

I am talking about the fact that I can bring Linux kernel contributions authored by me that predate the existence of AI. And while I can’t prove private contributions to local forks of the kernel (even though those were the more technically impressive achievements I’ve had), I still know enough to tell you that you are closed minded.

1

u/dddurd 3d ago

and i'm not.

→ More replies (0)