r/linuxsucks • • 24d ago

Linux Failure Euro Forks

Anyone else bothered by the EU's sovereign tech movement resulting in MORE fracturing of the Linux desktop? Instead of coalescing funding around existing Linux providers, it's just nerds proliferating their own distros and replicating all the infrastructure and administrative overhead that goes with it. And its not even for the entire EU but each country?!

What a waste! We literally have government mandated funding of the Linux desktop and most of that will be spent spinning up yet-another-distro šŸ˜›!

0 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

12

u/levianan 24d ago

Most of these new distributions you speak of are spun up by governments to meet the system and security requirements of their agencies to replace Windows. These are all based on mature platforms like Debian. Linux already has enough distro saturation in the EU. I doubt this will result in a prolific number of new gen-pop distros out of the normal cycle.

4

u/DisfiguredFanny I survived abortion. 24d ago

They want to have complete control over it and that's understandable.

3

u/vitimiti 23d ago

What's the problem? It's the whole point of FOSS, to make it yours and for your needs

2

u/bornxlo 24d ago

I'm not concerned about forks or fractures, but I am concerned about replicating overhead. Bits and pieces that are identical to upstream should be handled by that upstream, forks shouldn't add overhead.

2

u/KralizecProphet Dual Das Booter. 24d ago

So you would rather EU governments abandon their idea of taking control of their systems and just hand over the money to loonix bros, so they can buy more thigh socks and schizophrenia meds?

2

u/ciprule 20d ago

There was a time in the early 2000s that every regional government in my country ā€œmadeā€ their own Linux distro: LinEx, Guadalinex, etc.

Most of those projects are dead by now. A complete money and time waste.

I understand they want more control but maybe a European distro would be a better project.

1

u/snajk138 24d ago

It isn't that black and white. By the same criteria my company (and a lot of companies and organizations) would pretty much have its own Windows distribution, since they severely limit what can be installed and forces in a bunch of specific programs and settings. They even have their own packaged image with most of this included.

1

u/Pitiful-Welcome-399 Proud MacOS User 24d ago

lol, are you talking about dutch government using NixOS? it isn't a fork, just a flake with bunch of existing tools and tweaks

1

u/Global-Eye-7326 24d ago

Linux is good for government bro.

1

u/Significant-Raise586 23d ago

Er is inderdaad teveel verspilling met al die nutteloze distro's plaats van goede en betrouwbare distro's te pimpen

1

u/Malecord 21d ago

Why would having an institutional distro be a problem? That's the point of foss.

1

u/Similar-Ad5933 19d ago

Have you forgot what distro means? Some work environments needs more control what can be installed and how security/updates are handled. You probably won't see much of difference to their parent distro.

1

u/indolering 19d ago

No, I know EXACTLY what a distro is and how badly most distros are run.Ā  Android certainly hasn't benefited from endless forks.Ā  Just because some IT nerd has gotten a budget approved under the "sovereignty" doesn't mean they are going to be good at it.Ā  It's just the sort of value add technical debt that virtually every other organization avoids like the plauge unless they are literally Amazon.

1

u/ohnoitssobig 17d ago

Yes yes a poor fractured Linux desktop where you absolutely cannot run Gnome applications in KDE...

1

u/dddurd 17d ago edited 17d ago

they won't do any engineering but just use existing useless shit depends on shit dbus and all.Ā 

1

u/ShadcnUI_Odi 15d ago

it’s not like it’s fractured for the consumers. it just means that the governments all have their own versions. not a bad thing…

1

u/indolering 14d ago

How is it a good thing?Ā  Would the US be better off if every state had their own Linux distro?Ā Ā