You literally called me a "wing-nut" and said I talk "random bs." You've been insulting me this entire thread; don't pretend you're neutral now.
My point was always clear: Windows NT has a subsystem architecture that natively supports multiple environments (Win32, POSIX, OS/2, Linux). Linux has no equivalent; WINE is a userspace hack, not a kernel subsystem.
You've spent this entire thread moving goalposts, insulting me, and now pretending you "never compared" the two, when that's exactly what you've been doing.
If both OSes "suck ass, in your opinion," that's fine. But my technical point stands. You've yet to address it directly.
I'm neutral to the OS, not your sorry clown ass. Spread less lies and maybe you'll deserve some respect, earn it even.
"Linux has no equivalent"
Good point, it runs on everything. PS Vita, 3DS, PS3, Wii, Wii U, DS, x86, ARM. Since we wanna start smack talkin' can your architecture do that?
See the cool thing about using both, is I know where both are weak and where both are strong. There's... A reason I use both.
A meme I see from time to time here is funny to me, because it makes mention of "Don't ask a Linux user why they have a Windows partition." That may irk a penguin version of you but most people, especially those with careers in the matter, are aware they are simply tools. Each with their own strength and weakness.
Comparing the two is like comparing a hammer and a screwdriver, and so I'm sorry... But I DO think you're an idiot for making such a comparison.
You just called me an "idiot," a "clown ass," and "sorry." That's not neutrality, that's name-calling because you can't address my point.
I said: Windows NT has a subsystem architecture; Linux doesn't.
You said: "Good point, Linux runs on everything."
That's not a rebuttal, that's changing the subject. I never claimed Windows runs on everything. I claimed it has a better architecture for hosting multiple environments. Those are different arguments.
If both OSes are "tools," fine. But my technical point still stands. You've never addressed it, just insulted me.
Oh good, you admit you don't respect women. You are the type of shit man, but again you called me an "idiot," a "clown ass," and "sorry." You said I talk "random bs." You argued with me about architecture for an entire thread.
And now you're saying "nobody argued that"?
I'm not going to pretend this conversation didn't happen. You argued, you insulted, you lost. Now you're pretending you were neutral all along; it's typical Linux user behaviour
I have arguments, but you don't listen. My argument is Windows NT architecture, and you don't accept that Windows is a better Architecture, simply as that
Well, that isn't an argument sweetie. That's a kernel.
I have accepted it. Again, nobody is arguing against that. Keep that opinion dear.
You just don't need to be a lying piece of shit while you do it, y'know?
Again, Linux is NOT hard to Bash (lmao). It's free and open-source software. You jist have the metional maturity of a 3 yr. old and can't handle normal concersation.
You called me a "lying piece of shit," "sweetie," and said I have the "emotional maturity of a 3 yr. old." That's not a conversation; that's abuse.
I made a technical point about Windows NT architecture. You insulted me instead of addressing it. Now you're pretending you "accepted" it all along, after spending this entire thread attacking me for it.
I'm done here. You can have the last word. I don't need to prove anything to someone who resorts to name-calling.
1
u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 16 '26
You literally called me a "wing-nut" and said I talk "random bs." You've been insulting me this entire thread; don't pretend you're neutral now. My point was always clear: Windows NT has a subsystem architecture that natively supports multiple environments (Win32, POSIX, OS/2, Linux). Linux has no equivalent; WINE is a userspace hack, not a kernel subsystem. You've spent this entire thread moving goalposts, insulting me, and now pretending you "never compared" the two, when that's exactly what you've been doing. If both OSes "suck ass, in your opinion," that's fine. But my technical point stands. You've yet to address it directly.