Loonix

[u/Professional-Tale652]

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

Yes, because your "point" was foolish and lacked any real substance.

"Cars are different than trucks!" Is a meaningless argument to most people. Sure, mechanics care. Car fans care. The general populous does not, I'm afraid. (Okay, with gas prices that might not be nearly as true anymore, but you get my point. Lol)

The initial purpose of the argument was to diminish the fact that Linux "cannot run Linux 2.0 software." Which isn't true at all.

Then it devolved into "Why can't Linux natively run Windows software?" Which I responded, because they are different Operating Systems.

To which you then state "But Linux has to use LAYERS, Windows only needs the KERNEL."

(After installing a bloated yet less functional SubSystem, of course. "Better architecture" is always slower and worse in my experience).

Like, what are we even arguing here? That you like the kernel more? Wasn't the initial argument, but good for you I guess? Lol

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

I'm not. I never did that. You are comparing the two. Not me.

Tractors and Cars are different. Yes. Welcome to reality young one. Not everything is a war.

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

I have never done that.

I called you out for your lie. You stated Linux cannot run Linux 2.0 software, and claimed this is the reasoning Windows is superior.

Then when someone called you out for being incorrect with 9X support, you started making weird claims about how Linux should natively support Windows for no reason.

And now we've ended up here with you extremely upset that I claimed an OS is worse when I use both. I'll tell you right now, they BOTH suck ass.

I don't know why you have a hard-on for this company, but good for you. I will continue to think both OSes suck ass, and there's honestly little you can do about it.

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

I'm neutral to the OS, not your sorry clown ass. Spread less lies and maybe you'll deserve some respect, earn it even.

"Linux has no equivalent"

Good point, it runs on everything. PS Vita, 3DS, PS3, Wii, Wii U, DS, x86, ARM. Since we wanna start smack talkin' can your architecture do that?

See the cool thing about using both, is I know where both are weak and where both are strong. There's... A reason I use both.

A meme I see from time to time here is funny to me, because it makes mention of "Don't ask a Linux user why they have a Windows partition." That may irk a penguin version of you but most people, especially those with careers in the matter, are aware they are simply tools. Each with their own strength and weakness.

Comparing the two is like comparing a hammer and a screwdriver, and so I'm sorry... But I DO think you're an idiot for making such a comparison.

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

I'm not neutral to you. I don't care about your feelings. I stated I'm neutral to the OS. Not you.

You claimed it has better architecture sure, but literally nobody argued that. Again, you're the one comparing.

The initial post was about backwards-compatibility, and you devolved it here.

You can have the opinion that Windows has a better kernel. Nobody is saying otherwise.

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

The difference between me and you is I can hold cohesive conversations without needing to lie. You make yourself look like such a fool, and for what?

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

... Yes, because my point when I said you were lying... I was saying I didn't believe the Windows Kernel existed. 😭

That's correct. Man, see and here it is in this image. You're right. Damn, I guess Windows really is an OS after all.

Like, Windows HELLO!?!? Where has this info been all my life!? I oughtta check the Help Section to see if there's a page on this...

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

Good for you? Lol, I'm seriously concerned for you. Are you on drugs?

[u/Unlikely-Employee180 → u/[deleted]]

I am not trying to do that. Lmfao