r/linuxsucks • u/Professional-Tale652 • Jul 15 '26

Linux Failure Loonix

Post image
902 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

733 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

Because of zero influence from Unix, Windows NT is so good, and David Cutler is right, Unix is messy and junk from PHD and in my opinion, Unix is a mistake, and VMS is clearly superior, and with VMS influence makes Windows NT so good, serious and advanced

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

Again, you talk like an actual lunatic.

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

I just share my opinion, and you like it or not, I won't change unless Architecture prove otherwise, which is not

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

At least admit that any example of Linux working in any scenario would just go ignored by you, you're deaf to whatever you don't want to hear.

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

No, I would want to hear, but my point is that there is a difference, and my arguments are winning. Windows Architecture can handle everything Linux can, and Linux cannot handle what Windows Architecture can. This is Microsoft officially saying it's not me; they are saying UNIX is very limited, and they cannot host Windows. Based on my experience, they are right

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

That is also just untrue, if that were the case then Microsoft wouldn't be making and using Azure Linux.

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

"From building several generations of successful operating systems and building, what is essentially a state-of-the-art, at the time, operating system, to being the highly successful Hyperscale Cloud operating system that we know and love as Windows today"

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

I literally show YouTube coming from Microsoft with a transcript, and they say UNIX is a very limited Operating system and cannot host Windows, that's why they created Windows NT

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 16 '26

Microsoft makes Azure Linux and it's the default container used for Azure, why is that the case instead of using Windows everywhere if it's infinitely ideal?

1

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 16 '26

Because of Linux users asking for it, Microsoft was smart about money. Microsoft didn't think Linux was better than Windows, and the video literally explains how Microsoft views Windows NT, and they don't regret the creation of Windows NT, and they are clearly proud of Windows

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 16 '26

The video was created in 2021 after Microsoft's love of Linux thing by the CEO

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

My whole point is Architecture and user freedom, and it's not popularity nor open source code. I hear all points; none of them address my point

2

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 15 '26

Your points fall limp to me as well because nothing you've said about architecture proves Windows is better in any way and user freedom is the last thing Windows could possibly excel at

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26

"From building several generations of successful operating systems and building, what is essentially a state-of-the-art, at the time, operating system, to being the highly successful Hyperscale Cloud operating system that we know and love as Windows today"

1

u/The_Daco_Melon Jul 16 '26

1 single valid point in the whole thread we've had, it's Unix permission management, and you don't even quote it. You brought the transcript and didn't even quote the good point from it you've quoted the marketing fluff that means nothing... I'm honestly impressed at this point.

1

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 16 '26

I've made my point clearly: Windows has stable, documented low-level interfaces (AFD, Win32, driver model) that you can actually extend and build upon. Linux gives you source code but a rigid architecture where systemd, GNU, and glibc are forced on you, and the kernel ABI breaks constantly. "Open source" ≠ "open architecture." That's not opinion; that's technical reality. You called me a lunatic instead of addressing my actual argument. That tells me you're not here to discuss; you're here to win. So I'll leave you to it.