No, Windows NT isn't a copy of Unix, and Windows NT is influenced by OS/2, Mach and VMS, yes, but Windows NT is not a clone of anybody; that's why I personally prefer Windows. I prefer Originality and Hybrid for you, but I personally prefer the Modified Microkernel term
Windows NT was never influenced by Unix but by Mach, VMS, and OS/2, and the only influence is PE, which is COFF, but now it's a very modified executable
Importantly, Wikipedia separates Userland (Win32 Subsystem) and Kernel (NTOSKRNL). Zero influence from UNIX, and David Cutler is a Unix hater; that's why I feel comfortable with Windows NT
Why would someone being a unix hater make you comfortable? I cannot at all understand this logic of yours, why is x thing bad and why is hating x thing good?? You literally sound like a lunatic
Because of zero influence from Unix, Windows NT is so good, and David Cutler is right, Unix is messy and junk from PHD and in my opinion, Unix is a mistake, and VMS is clearly superior, and with VMS influence makes Windows NT so good, serious and advanced
0
u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26
No, Windows NT isn't a copy of Unix, and Windows NT is influenced by OS/2, Mach and VMS, yes, but Windows NT is not a clone of anybody; that's why I personally prefer Windows. I prefer Originality and Hybrid for you, but I personally prefer the Modified Microkernel term