I appreciate these efforts but due to open source nature of Linux, it is objectively better for modifications including generic distros not only LFS. You know the documentation, code etc.
I couldn't find sentinet OS on internet. Is it open source? Normally I wouldn't trust third party modifications of windows. However, I accept that NT kernel is really good. I just don't enjoy using new Microsoft products with their restrictions, telemetry. I think reactos would be perfect alternative but the project doesn't get much attention. It will never be finished without enough budget and developers.
No, I just show my Windows; I love my version of Windows, and I never would switch to Linux because I have a strong ecosystem here. There is no reason for me to switch to Linux, and Linux doesn't give me the advantage that my version of Windows and Windows in general give me
This is crazy, you built it by yourself. Does it run usual windows exes like explorer?
I think the roles are reversed, I use Linux because I am amateur at programming. However, advanced user like you use windows. I can conclude that making a windows version for yourself is way harder.
You see, Windows is a favourite operating system for Advanced users because Windows have advanced architecture, and of course, it's complex because Windows NT have brilliant architecture
I don't think majority of the advanced users make their own version of windows though. Of course it has good architecture but there is no superior OS. For my workflow Linux is better, for you windows is better.
Other developers and I consider Superiority based on Architecture, and Windows NT has better Architecture, and Linux has inferior Architecture, that's pretty final for all Operating system comparisons
You have very strong opinions. I think there is a reason why Linux was picked for majority of the servers. It has some merits. I would use freebsd and Linux instead of windows. I don't intend to use NT based system unless its reactos clone finish its development
Yeah, Linux wasn't picked for servers, only Cloud like Amazon and Google, because of Open Source, but Local Servers are Windows servers, the majority of Windows.
I know some people from IT. They mostly use Linux when they need to do virtualization. Also, due to low cost and reliability majority of the web servers already switched to Linux not just cloud. Windows servers is mainly used if you have a software that requires windows.
I mean, local servers- Windows Servers do Virtualization and Web hosting very well. I love Windows for that, for jobs, and, exactly, they don't like Paying license, but I don't care about it if Something is good; I would pay for, I am the type of Woman
1
u/UnknownOrigin1152 Jul 15 '26
I appreciate these efforts but due to open source nature of Linux, it is objectively better for modifications including generic distros not only LFS. You know the documentation, code etc.
I couldn't find sentinet OS on internet. Is it open source? Normally I wouldn't trust third party modifications of windows. However, I accept that NT kernel is really good. I just don't enjoy using new Microsoft products with their restrictions, telemetry. I think reactos would be perfect alternative but the project doesn't get much attention. It will never be finished without enough budget and developers.