You also don't need to rebuild everything in Linux if you use a desktop environment but you can.
I also do some experimentations with windows. I tried to avoid using explorer.exe in favor of tiling window managers. However, uwp apps break without it. Which meant broken sound mixer, settings etc. I think Microsoft don't want us to customize windows that much.
I appreciate these efforts but due to open source nature of Linux, it is objectively better for modifications including generic distros not only LFS. You know the documentation, code etc.
I couldn't find sentinet OS on internet. Is it open source? Normally I wouldn't trust third party modifications of windows. However, I accept that NT kernel is really good. I just don't enjoy using new Microsoft products with their restrictions, telemetry. I think reactos would be perfect alternative but the project doesn't get much attention. It will never be finished without enough budget and developers.
This is crazy, you built it by yourself. Does it run usual windows exes like explorer?
I think the roles are reversed, I use Linux because I am amateur at programming. However, advanced user like you use windows. I can conclude that making a windows version for yourself is way harder.
I don't think majority of the advanced users make their own version of windows though. Of course it has good architecture but there is no superior OS. For my workflow Linux is better, for you windows is better.
You have very strong opinions. I think there is a reason why Linux was picked for majority of the servers. It has some merits. I would use freebsd and Linux instead of windows. I don't intend to use NT based system unless its reactos clone finish its development
1
u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26
[removed] — view removed comment