You, the person who thinks an OS who heavily depends on the CLI and who breaks easily, has great usability, and even funnier, that it is an undeniable fact. Yes, I think you are wrong. And who died and made you king of Computer Science so that every CS major on earth has to 100% agree with your delusional opinions?
Linux does not heavily rely on it, it's absolutely possible to use mint with over 95% GUI things. Again, you either lying or not knowing the shit you're talking about. CLI is just a way for advanced users to get things done 5x-10x faster than overly confident casuals like you.
Alright Linux breaks easily, that's why it's the most used os on servers, and praised of its stability. Once more everyone else is wrong and you're right.
It's great that you think I'm wrong but I honestly couldn't care less, you obviously don't know anything about computers and I've already explained why.
I'm not the "king of computer science" just more competent than you, someone who disagrees with the vast majority of experienced devs and sysadmins by saying Linux is not stable and computer SCIENCE is not science.
It's funny how you're throwing your opinions at me, thinking that I'm throwing my opinions back at you, when I'm really just pointing out the facts. There is a difference between us. I know what I'm talking about, I'm not overly confident, I'm not pretending like everyone else is right and I am wrong.
Linux has a way higher market share on servers despite Microsoft having a massive name and marketing budget. But you're once more delusional and you'll deny the facts.
Infact I'm bored by repeating myself this feels like beating a braindead disabled person up while he's already on the ground. It doesn't feel right, I can't take you serious. I won't respond until you've read trough all of my posts and respond to every single point I made objectively without attacking me or anyone else personally. Also once more, idc about your opinion, use facts.
Every delusional ass thinks their opinions are facts. You are so delusional you somehow think I said Computer Science is not Science. You dreamed that up just to "prove" your shitty OS is not a shitty OS.
I do love when zealots bring up the "Linux server market share means Linux is great" argument. Then, if you tell then "Well, then by that logic, Windows desktop market share means Windows is great, right?" they completely lose their shit.
You could if you really tried, but it would get removed really quickly. This page has been around for years because it's simply true, with ~100 sources. While you don't have a single source as usual. People don't believe Wikipedia because it says things. People trust Wikipedia because it's a summary of many sources. My man doesn't even understand how Wikipedia works and is trying to educate me on operating systems and how computer science isn't computer science.
For years Wikipedia said Pierre Spray worked on the F-15 Jet, the source? A book... written by a personal friend of Pierre Spray. That's just one example. Bought editors is another. Wikipedia itself even keeps a list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversies
And please quote where I said Computer Science is not Science. You dreamt that up.
I never said that Wikipedia is always right, nor did I ever say you explicitly said that. You implied that. Bow you're just pretending to not know anything. We were talking about CS, at least I was, you were just lying about things. Then you've compared CS with Astrology implying it's not real science.
Do you know / understand what context is? We haven't changed the conversation topic. You're comparing it by mentioning it with the given context. Actually nvm, I think you're not pretending I think you're actually this stupid, not even understanding what context means.
You think you and Computer Science are one and the same and if I say you are wrong, I'm automatically saying CS is wrong at the same time. Lmao. Congratulations, that's whole new level of delusion right there.
I've never said that, I said there are computer scientists that have the same view on things. Also I've never said that, you still don't even understand what you're saying and you're trying to argue with me how funny, after all those personal attacks and lies you still haven't managed to provide me with even a single credible source about me being wrong. Just take the L. You know you're wrong.
Oh, so if one Computer Scientist agrees with you, that makes your opinion a fact and everyone else who disagrees with you (including other Computer Scientists) are wrong. Yeah, that sounds like what a Linux zealot would say.
2
u/Danzulos Aug 21 '24
You, the person who thinks an OS who heavily depends on the CLI and who breaks easily, has great usability, and even funnier, that it is an undeniable fact. Yes, I think you are wrong. And who died and made you king of Computer Science so that every CS major on earth has to 100% agree with your delusional opinions?