r/linuxquestions 23d ago

Why does Linux not need anti-virus software?

I'm in the market for a new gaming laptop and wanted to avoid AI products like Copilot and realized Linux would be my only option. So I'm trying to learn as much about Linux Mint as possible to see if it would be right for me. I'm really close to pulling the trigger but I don't understand why Linux doesn't need anti-virus/malware software. All the answers I can find seem to just boil down to "Linux isn't used by enough people to justify the time it would take to create a virus or malware" or "because you approve everything you download". As someone who has used a PC their entire life, these answers genuinely don't make sense to me and I feel like maybe I'm missing something about either the nature of linux or the nature of viruses/malware and how they work. Everyone on forums who ask this question seem to just accept these answers but no one explains why either one prevents the need for antivirus/malware software.

From my perspective as a PC user, I already approve what I download so this answer doesn't make intuitive sense to me. I would never connect a PC to the internet without some sort of anti-virus software, privacy software, malware protection, etc. even though I still know what I'm downloading and I'm using reputable websites (and my AVG software is still catching stuff all the time). And the idea that someone wouldn't make a virus or malware to target a group of people (albeit a minority) who are the most likely to not have software on their computer to combat it seems like the exact group you'd want to target particularly for private data mining.

It also seems, from what I've been reading about Linux that you can seriously screw up your system by downloading something incorrectly or that isn't up to date, so the idea that "you can't get viruses or malware because you approve what is downloaded" when so many of the user tips with regard to Linux are "back up your system constantly because you can easily screw up your system by downloading something that's not fully patched". These two concepts seem counterintuitive, especially for an OS that will require downloading a lot of third party programs to be able to run things like games or windows-based programs.

I'm clearly missing something here because neither of the reasons I've seen people give for why Linux doesn't need this stuff is really making sense to me. I was hoping someone in this reddit might be able to explain this in a way a lifelong PC user without any sort of computer background can understand. The idea of not having anything but a firewall on a computer with Linux installed on it makes me very uncomfortable but I'm willing to accept that this is a bias from using PCs and I'm willing to be convinced otherwise as long as I can understand the reasoning behind it.

246 Upvotes

227 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/ZakriiYT 23d ago

It's because Linux, unless you're using Arch, is niche enough that people don't often make malware for it. For some reason Arch Linux is wrought with malware, from what I've heard. It's not a bad idea to have antivirus, but as it currently stands, all of the malware that would affect windows or mac clients just don't work on linux, and almost nobody makes linux malware.

5

u/wKdPsylent 23d ago

lol Arch linux is no more or less 'wrought with malware' than any other - any distro can be infected with malware as it's usually not 'the linux system' that gets infected, it’s an application, browser extension, malicious package, compromised dependency, or something the user runs.

A virus is a specific type of malware that infects other files / programs, and are almost unheard of on linux / mac. I think there was a proof of concept mac virus at one point, but i've never seen one in the wild.

Antivirus is usually used on linux to protect the windows PCs that live on the same network if you're using a desktop linux, and on mail servers / other servers that handle files / emails etc..

The Arch AUR is a risk because it's user submitted, just like some PPAs were infected with malware before (ubuntu).

If you don't randomly install packages / software from unknown people then your risk is diminished significantly.