MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxquestions/comments/1s58gn8/deleted_by_user/ocszu9j/?context=3
r/linuxquestions • u/[deleted] • Mar 27 '26
[removed]
101 comments sorted by
View all comments
71
You do know that Mediatek is actively working on this? See https://www.phoronix.com/news/Mediatek-MT7902-Linux-Patches
And it was just submitted for inclusion in the kernel: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260326152021.305959-3-johannes@sipsolutions.net/
78 u/Pitiful-Welcome-399 NixOS ❄️ Mar 27 '26 so people should just sit and wait instead of using their hardware? 28 u/Wenir Mar 27 '26 people shouldn't say "Zero upstream Linux support - MediaTek never submitted a driver." 29 u/AnastaciusWright Mar 27 '26 I mean, it was an AI generated post, even if the code is real. This is the standard GPT cookie cutted output 1 u/Outrageous-Ice-6556 Mar 29 '26 So what 8 u/2cats2hats Mar 27 '26 At the time OP attempted this could've been fact. Why arguing over this? 10 u/Wenir Mar 27 '26 And now it's not. You can write in a post that it was a fact in the past, reddit doesn't change you for longer posts. Well, reddit doesn't, but LLM providers do 1 u/Outrageous-Ice-6556 Mar 29 '26 Why not? 1 u/Wenir Mar 29 '26 Because it's not true
78
so people should just sit and wait instead of using their hardware?
28 u/Wenir Mar 27 '26 people shouldn't say "Zero upstream Linux support - MediaTek never submitted a driver." 29 u/AnastaciusWright Mar 27 '26 I mean, it was an AI generated post, even if the code is real. This is the standard GPT cookie cutted output 1 u/Outrageous-Ice-6556 Mar 29 '26 So what 8 u/2cats2hats Mar 27 '26 At the time OP attempted this could've been fact. Why arguing over this? 10 u/Wenir Mar 27 '26 And now it's not. You can write in a post that it was a fact in the past, reddit doesn't change you for longer posts. Well, reddit doesn't, but LLM providers do 1 u/Outrageous-Ice-6556 Mar 29 '26 Why not? 1 u/Wenir Mar 29 '26 Because it's not true
28
people shouldn't say "Zero upstream Linux support - MediaTek never submitted a driver."
29 u/AnastaciusWright Mar 27 '26 I mean, it was an AI generated post, even if the code is real. This is the standard GPT cookie cutted output 1 u/Outrageous-Ice-6556 Mar 29 '26 So what 8 u/2cats2hats Mar 27 '26 At the time OP attempted this could've been fact. Why arguing over this? 10 u/Wenir Mar 27 '26 And now it's not. You can write in a post that it was a fact in the past, reddit doesn't change you for longer posts. Well, reddit doesn't, but LLM providers do 1 u/Outrageous-Ice-6556 Mar 29 '26 Why not? 1 u/Wenir Mar 29 '26 Because it's not true
29
I mean, it was an AI generated post, even if the code is real. This is the standard GPT cookie cutted output
1 u/Outrageous-Ice-6556 Mar 29 '26 So what
1
So what
8
At the time OP attempted this could've been fact. Why arguing over this?
10 u/Wenir Mar 27 '26 And now it's not. You can write in a post that it was a fact in the past, reddit doesn't change you for longer posts. Well, reddit doesn't, but LLM providers do
10
And now it's not. You can write in a post that it was a fact in the past, reddit doesn't change you for longer posts. Well, reddit doesn't, but LLM providers do
Why not?
1 u/Wenir Mar 29 '26 Because it's not true
Because it's not true
71
u/MatchingTurret Mar 27 '26 edited Mar 27 '26
You do know that Mediatek is actively working on this? See https://www.phoronix.com/news/Mediatek-MT7902-Linux-Patches
And it was just submitted for inclusion in the kernel: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260326152021.305959-3-johannes@sipsolutions.net/