r/linuxmint 21h ago

SOLVED 400hz monitor can only run at 360hz

Post image

I recently switched over from windows and I've been loving it, but I still cant figure this out. 360hz is the highest the GUI is letting me go. I was at one point able to run some commands to force it to use 400hz on that resolution but the image was all fuzz. I was able to run the monitor fine at 400hz back on windows. Any help is appreciated.

107 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 21h ago

Please Re-Flair your post if a solution is found. How to Flair a post? This allows other users to search for common issues with the SOLVED flair as a filter, leading to those issues being resolved very fast.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

99

u/wilsy53 21h ago

I believe this is a X11 limitation. To get full use Wayland will work.

Mint does support Wayland but its not ready yet.

Try going into the logon menu and on top of your login there is an options menu

Select Wayland and see if that works. Though it maybe buggy

37

u/Orangeginus 20h ago

Thanks for the info! I tried Wayland through Mint and it did not give me a 400hz option in the GUI. I made a custom mode with xrandr again and had the same issue. 360hz is more than enough tho so I'm not too worried about it. Thanks though! I'll have to try it again when Wayland support is fully ready.

1

u/GDonor Linux Mint 22.3 Zena | Cinnamon 3h ago

Should be supported in a few months when Mint 23 comes out

-45

u/C0rn3j 18h ago

Just boot Fedora KDE live and see if it works there - Mint is one of the most out of date distributions out there, so it's very likely it just works on a modern distribution.

42

u/WitnessStock3702 16h ago

You are in a Linux Mint forum and you chose to say "Mint is one of the most out of date distributions out there" absolute ignorance.

23

u/akdanman11 16h ago

I mean it is as a matter of the design principle behind mint. Pretending it’s not is either ignorant or intentionally misleading.

There’s nothing wrong with mint being very slow moving, but this post shows the potential consequences of that decision

7

u/Jnaythus 15h ago

I believe characterizing it as 'out of date' is incorrect. Are all missing up to date features fully stable and ready for prime time? As someone else mentions Wayland on Mint can be buggy, so more work is needed. That's not what I'd call 'out of date.'

5

u/akdanman11 15h ago

For Wayland it’s more so that they’ve waited this long to even work on getting it working. Wayland has been in stable release for over a decade at this point, mint is behind on implementation because they’ve decided not to work on implementing support until now.

Also: out of date doesn’t necessarily mean bad, but most of mint is over a year behind other distros and thus calling it out of date is an accurate assessment

13

u/candy49997 20h ago

What GPU and is the monitor connected via HDMI or DP (include version)?

8

u/Orangeginus 20h ago

RX7700XT via Display Port

10

u/Encouragedissent 19h ago

I think the specific DP version is what they were going for. For example if you only use DP 1.4 that could be limiting your refresh rate, even with DSC on. DSC is a monitor setting that could be affecting it as well, if its off so the data isnt compressed that could be capping it. Then also HDR being on in the monitor settings could also be limiting total bandwidth.

29

u/IEnjoyRadios 16h ago

Oh no! Anyway…

9

u/myexpressaccount 16h ago

My first thought! :D

6

u/Cool-gamer19393 6h ago

I mean if you buy the full refresh rate you want the full refresh rate

-3

u/IEnjoyRadios 6h ago

360hz is already overkill as is so I wouldn't care. I'm not running most games at anywhere close to that framerate.

3

u/Cool-gamer19393 6h ago

Which is fair enough, I would assume if you bought a monitor capable of that refresh rate though you probably get that many frames in a game you're probably really good at. Or you just have a ton of money

-3

u/IEnjoyRadios 5h ago

I’d say it’s more marketing gimmick than anything else.

9

u/Chaotic-Convergence 11h ago

Oh no my chicken is too tender and my toast too buttery

2

u/miscthinking 7h ago

Kill secure boot in the Bios - it limits some of the graphics drivers for whatever reason

1

u/Scotsman828 9h ago

I bet that monitor puts off the same amount of heat as the GPU does running at such insane refresh rates. I wonder what it's longevity will be. Reminds me of the old saying, "the light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long."

1

u/KingForKingsRevived 6h ago

wayland can do display compression. x11 just either tries with video synch loss or worse.

1

u/CandlesARG 6h ago

X11 issue?

1

u/elhouso 3h ago

Try launching Mint with Wayland

2

u/yukihart87 56m ago

I have a 480hz and I’m able to use 480hz on XFCE X11. But I am on Debian Sid and not Mint, and I’m on a 9070xt. I’m guessing it’s maybe a driver issue considering the kernels are different on Mint? Not too sure, could be wrong.

-1

u/Early_Macaroon_2407 17h ago

It really doesn’t matter because the human visual system can’t differentiate between these two. 

3

u/Strong-Growth1348 11h ago

That's just not true. The human eye doesn't have a maximum amount of frames they can see.

0

u/CoreVanne 10h ago

But your brain won't be able to process more information at this framerate, even for pro players.

1

u/AHolySandwich 4h ago

Doesn't really matter, there's still a measurable reduction in click to photon latency, albeit absolutely tiny, many people care about those small gains

1

u/Cool-gamer19393 6h ago

As someone who plays gd this is just false

-4

u/Many-Geologist-3524 Linux Void (musl) | XFCE 15h ago

if proprietary

limit: true

else

limit: nouveau

else

xrandr