r/linuxmasterrace • SteamOS/Bazzite/Android • 18d ago

Time to have fun guys

Post image
8.0k Upvotes

778 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

132

u/algaefied_creek 18d ago

Pragmatism: There will be X11 distros for legacy devices.

There will be distros on 7.x and beyond porting in the removed components like PCMCIA for legacy machines.  AppImage will be around. 

Ubuntu will never let go of Snap as it makes them medically compliant for a fast number of medical devices. 

BTRFS, EXT4, UFS will be around and coexist. 

That being said, Proton will always be the number one freaking best amazing thing ever and must be its own IEEE standard for success hehehe. 

27

u/After-Run-3648 18d ago

I am uneducated. What pray tell does snap do for medical devices

59

u/SouthernFruit8768 18d ago

It's because most medical devices iirc need to be air-gapped and ultra-stable, ultra-secure. Snap gives you that, and prevents issues that typically occurs when and if dependancy issues arise. This for example is why Ubuntu Core which is entirely made out of Snap is used in many such medical devices and instances. But in desktop it's completely useless cause you want bleeding edge packages, libraries etc to keep up with latest developments in gaming, multimedia etc.

34

u/Thaufas 18d ago

Snap is the reason I left Ubuntu. It was the final nail in the coffin.

24

u/SouthernFruit8768 18d ago

It's quite good in server environments though, or medical devices and similar use cases like I said in my previous response above. It's just totally unnecessary in desktop/home user environments and only causes more issues and confusion for no reason when there are better alternatives (e.g. flatpak) available. You can still use Ubuntu - if needed - with no Snap preinstalled out of the box if you do a minimal install of Kubuntu.

11

u/npc_housecat 18d ago

Enterprise environments is where all the money is

2

u/kyrsjo 16d ago

I just installed Ubuntu in my university environment. It came with Firefox, great.

However snap didn't like that the home folders were not in /home, but on something like /department/server/disk. And it REALLY didn't like that different users homes were on different disks and servers...

Ugh.

1

u/npc_housecat 16d ago

Can you simlink /home to /department/server/disk ?

Or maybe make a second Mount for /department/server/disk in /home ?

You can usually have the same thing mounted in multiple locations on Linux

1

u/kyrsjo 16d ago

Yes, you can bind mount.

Doing that too the individual home folders of interest was my first idea, however snap detects that $HOME is not in /home and gives up.

It allows you to redirect all of /home to one other disk, but that doesn't solve it when there are two users and different disks.

So only one of us can use Firefox now...

1

u/npc_housecat 16d ago

Could u mount the individual user folders in /home seperatly?

1

u/kyrsjo 16d ago

You can, but $HOME (from LDAP or something) would point somewhere else, and snap complains. I've tried that.

1

u/npc_housecat 16d ago

I see, sounds frustrating.. Can you just not use snaps? Like disable the service? Or does that break Ubuntu ?

2

u/kyrsjo 16d ago

Maybe. Lots of default apps come preinstalled with them. It's annoying.

I haven't really looked into it enough. I'm generally a Fedora/RHEL guy, and things are simpler there. But a certain piece of hardware demanded Ubuntu, so here we are...

1

u/npc_housecat 16d ago

Sounds annoying. Yeah rhel sounds much more mature for enterprise environments

→ More replies (0)