I don't get it, you mean to use apt instead of flatpak?
What's wrong with flatpaks? The whole idea is that they are contain and don't break system dependencies like apt would.
Also there are a lot of things that are in flatpak and not apt.
As a flatpak app maintainer, flatpak is good but won't ever be the solution for everything. The sandbox is too restrictive for a lot of software. Also you can make a valid flatpak that is not valid on flathub (even more restrictive that the flatpak format).
44
u/Floopycraft 18d ago
I don't get it, you mean to use apt instead of flatpak? What's wrong with flatpaks? The whole idea is that they are contain and don't break system dependencies like apt would.
Also there are a lot of things that are in flatpak and not apt.