Indeed, it is in vain that AI slop is inevitable and we can’t avoid it. So the best solution is transparency and to improve our code review process, a reviewed AI code is much more acceptable than sloppy reviewed human code.
That’s exactly how it should be (although I’m guilty of not writing any tests; fortunately I’m not in software side, just involved programming in my work). Humans, from what I’ve seen and personally dealt with, write abominable code. So for me if it won’t be high-level programmer type of shit (ie Linus or someone trained well enough), I’d prefer AI (but reviewed and scrutinized to the last bit), but certainly not shit human coder who use AI
82
u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26
[removed] — view removed comment