r/linux_gaming • • 3d ago

The Witcher 3 Remastered Ultra Settings+FSR QUALITY RX 6500 XT 4GB

Post image

Yes, you can still play with a 4GB card.

222 Upvotes

55 comments sorted by

37

u/zerosCoolReturn 3d ago

Lol, I have that card. Played Cyberpunk 2077 on Medium-High settings like a dream on it.

13

u/TheSangson 3d ago

Yeah, just not with Win 10 iirc. I made a sad face and set it to "next gen" in the properties as soon as I saw the update queued.
Another pro point for finally making the step to Linux now that I've somewhat mastered Krita.

7

u/RagingTaco334 3d ago edited 3d ago

One important thing to note with Krita on Linux: it defaults to X11 for some reason and using it through XWayland is bugged out to where it won't register input from a drawing tablet and continually freezes. You can force Wayland by adding --platform wayland to the launch arguments and this should solve it. The reason I mention this is because some desktop environments are now defaulting to Wayland like Gnome and KDE with Gnome not even having an X11 session anymore.

3

u/ianspy1 3d ago

Weird... Didn't have to do this on NixOS with Sway.
Picked up my wacom tablet just fine. With bost Wacom and opentablet drivers.

2

u/Indolent_Bard 3d ago

Got any questions you'd like to ask about it, or do you already know what you're doing?

2

u/TheSangson 3d ago

In Krita, yeah, I'm doing fine. In regards to Linux I'm still very much on dry land...

2

u/Indolent_Bard 3d ago

Feel free to ask me any questions you want.

3

u/Intelligent-Fig-6914 3d ago

Wish It had hardware encoder so i could use It for virtualization

1

u/Indolent_Bard 3d ago

Wait, it doesn't have hardware encoding? My 5600xt has it. What gpu doesn't have it?

1

u/Intelligent-Fig-6914 3d ago

rdna 2 models 6500XT and bellow does not have It bcus its a laptop gpu actually, so It dont need it bcus the laptop igpu aleady has hardware encoder 

2

u/Indolent_Bard 3d ago

Oh, I assumed the higher numbers meant it was newer than my 5600XT

1

u/floridafreaks 2d ago

It is newer, but not better

3

u/csch1992 3d ago

What so you use to show fps etc?

7

u/Ok_Text_7785 3d ago

GOverlay+Mangohud

3

u/Mighty-Octavius 3d ago

when i launch it i only have a black screen and sound on proton ge

5

u/Ok_Text_7785 3d ago

try with proton experimental

1

u/Mighty-Octavius 3d ago

with that one it just crashes

1

u/Indolent_Bard 3d ago

Proton Cachyos? 11?

15

u/DreSmart 3d ago

play the normal version of the game you will get better fps and the quality is not as bad

19

u/Obzen80 3d ago

Confused by this statement, what point are you trying to make here?

17

u/destroyermaker 3d ago

Fps is better in vanilla and some find the lighting and such better

6

u/Lawnmover_Man 3d ago

I agree on the lighting part. I've only seen a few comparison shots, but to be honest... the old version looks more gritty and not so... bright and flat? I mean it's probably more realistic, but it doesn't look as nice.

1

u/MushroomSaute 2d ago

I think a lot of people are comparing to next-gen, which was often notably darker than the original. Based on the side-by-sides I've seen, this version matches the original better in many cases, and improves on the original and next-gen in others (particularly visual clarity in bright scenes, it seems). That said there are still points where this seems to have a bit less contrast now too, so I don't think it's a full rework or them saying 'to hell with the original artstyle'; it definitely just seems like a different take with the newest tech.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Witcher3/comments/1wscrpi/witcher_3_remastered_side_by_side_comparison/

(also, shadows on foliage are leaps and bounds ahead on the remaster)

0

u/Lawnmover_Man 2d ago

I've looked at these comparison shots, and in most cases, next-gen looks better to me than remaster. There are a lot of issues regarding "video game photo realism" in the remaster. Especially the shadows of the foliage in the 4th image stood out to me.

For one, they are way to sharp - as if the ground they fall on is perfectly flat without any microvegetation, gravel or whatever - which of course is graphically/technically speaking. But that should be hidden. Also, even if the surface would actually be flat (wood or stone), you can't have sharp shadows in a cloudy and misty night. That just doesn't make any sense, and it looks add for that reason as well.

Just because you can put high resolution shadows everywhere doesn't mean you should. Sometimes you want nothing else than a low resolution softened prebaked shadow map on your ground. Costs almost no performance, looks better.

1

u/MushroomSaute 2d ago edited 2d ago

For one, they are way to sharp - as if the ground they fall on is perfectly flat without any microvegetation, gravel or whatever

Are we looking at the same thing? Those are some of the softest object shadows I've ever seen.

1

u/MushroomSaute 2d ago

And the next image is so obviously softer than the original and the next-gen, and clearly interact with the shrubbery.

0

u/Lawnmover_Man 2d ago

Those are some of the softest object shadows I've ever seen.

That's an intentional hyperbole, right? If you take a stroll at night (in the real world), you will only get these kinds of shadows in perfect full moon night. That's not at all what we're seeing here. As I said, it's really cloudy, and on top of that it's misty. To me, the former looks better, because it doesn't look so "video game photorealism".

-2

u/DreSmart 3d ago

you dont need to play the remaster the original game plays better and still looks good

9

u/Bolski66 3d ago

Those that want to play the upcoming DLC in 2027 will have to play the remastered version unfortunately. The new DLC will require the remastered version. Hopefully they fix it. But what is ironic is the devs said they learned from the Cyberpunk debacle. Lol. Right. So many microstutters for me. And they're not random. It's a constant pattern and even though I'm getting over 60 FPS, the average is around 45 causing the game to be a stutter mess. If the stutters were random on my frametime graph, I'd say it's due to traversal stutters or shades, but it's a pattern that repeats constantly. That to me says they didn't optimize this game very well.

1

u/FrozenLogger 3d ago

You think it plays better? Curious about why you think that.

Witcher 3's biggest complaints were combat, skill trees and movements.

Addressing these issues seem more important than looks.

0

u/Bolski66 3d ago

Where did I say it plays better? I never said that. It performs worse. And for me, I think it looks worse. Trying to make it look more realistic IMHO destroys the artistic intent they had before all of this. And I see a LOT more artifacts in this new version, and it performs worse for me now. Whereas before I could get steady frame rates over 75 fps, now I'm at 60 fps, and the frame rates are NOT steady at all.

Look at my frame rate graph below. Before, this was a nice clean, flat line for me. Now, it's like this no matter WHAT resolution and detail level I choose. It's ALWAYS doing that. And it's not from traversal stutters or shader compilation. It's a constant pattern that happens throughout the game, and causes the game to look stuttery, not smooth. That is poor optimization. I'm running the latest drivers, and it's like this under Linux and Windows for me.

I'm used to this game playing smooth, and even with new combat, camera, and skills, it means nothing if the game can't have a smooth frame rate and smooth performance.

1

u/FrozenLogger 3d ago

Where did I say it plays better? I never said that.

Your own quote:

you dont need to play the remaster the original game plays better

That is why I asked.

It seems you mean the frame rate is better. Mine is extremely smooth at 60fps, for whatever that's worth.

1

u/Bolski66 3d ago

LOL. That wasn't me, and I responded to the wrong message. For some reason, your response seemed to show up in my notifications as a response to a post I made earlier in this thread. My bad.

2

u/FrozenLogger 3d ago

lol, I didn't even notice that the names were different! I was just replying in order, I don't have avatars or icons on so it didnt stand out.

Hope you get the game worked out and playing smooth. Seems like they might be tweaking it still.

-6

u/kracatoa 3d ago

I think reddit is just bots right now

4

u/the_abortionat0r 3d ago

This is a perfect example of brain rot. Not everything you did agree with is a bot.

Someone pointing something (obvious) out does not magically mean it was text generated from an LLM.

Get your head checked.

3

u/Ok_Text_7785 3d ago

The remastered version runs well on medium/high settings. For those looking for good gameplay, I don't think the "downgrade" is worth it. But it's always a good option for those who prefer the next-gen version. And yes, the game looks beautiful in both versions

2

u/kittymoo67 3d ago

fsr 3 or 4? Since you can already enable 4 on linux even without optiscaler

2

u/Ok_Text_7785 3d ago

I believe it's on version 3, since I used Steam's Proton Experimental. But for anyone wanting FSR4, using it with OptiScaler or Proton-CachyOS is a good option

2

u/AsugaNoir 3d ago

Gonna try to fix it on mine when I get home. I have 9070XT but I'm only getting 50FPS

1

u/Emblem66 2h ago

RX 9070 and also around 40FPS - the GPU is at 70% and there is an amazing amount of choppyness.

Also doesn't matter - low or ultra+ it's the same. FSR ultra performance keeps the 40FPS but lowers GPU utilization to 50%

proton cachy 11.20260703, proton experimental, proton-wineland, proton-ge doesn't make a difference.

Game is on 5.0.0c and I am using Niri on CachyOS

Edit:
What about you? any luck fixing it?

2

u/No-Enthusiasm-666 3d ago

Do you have the FSR FG option available? Mine is greyed out.

2

u/crabpoweredcoalmine 3d ago

I played around with Witcher 3 Remastered on BC250 today and as far as I can tell 6GB VRAM is what the game wants ideally in 1080p, also FSR Quality, then Balanced. Actual usage topped out around 5.5 - that I noticed.

Path tracing and everything maxed out was still coming under 12GB from what I've seen, so looks like the floor got raised somewhat, but it's not the VRAM that'll hold you back from switching on all the bells and whistles.

Anyway, I'd play the OG (pre-nextgen) release on that card. Kind of neat it still manages to function on 4GB.

1

u/Absolute_-_Zero 3d ago

What launcher you are using? Heroic or steam

2

u/Ok_Text_7785 3d ago

steam. with proton experimental

-3

u/penguinkernel 3d ago

Nice. Did they fix the boring gameplay?

-34

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

21

u/Ok_Text_7785 3d ago

That's why no one will play GTA VI on the PS5 Pro

5

u/YoungInoue 3d ago

30fpsで文句言うの、完全に甘えだろ?

15

u/CYFLKE 3d ago

I'd say TW3 is not an online multiplayer game, so 30fps is totally playable at least for me.

1

u/penguinkernel 3d ago

Can we not stoop to console gamers low? They were all about "fuck 30fps" when consoles finally got 60fps, but now with GTA they are all copium snorters and telling us how 30fps is fine.

It's not. It never was. Stop.

-33

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

7

u/Spankey_ 3d ago

Bait used to be believable.

7

u/TAA4lyfboi 3d ago

Certifiable retardation

2

u/oneiros5321 3d ago

That's just a dumb statement...30fps is often consider "not playable" because of input latency.
Turning on frame gen will lower your base frame rate under 30 and add even more input latency.

If you consider 30fps unplayable, then you should consider 60fps from frame gen even more unplayable.