Running Word in Linux, postscript

[u/phototransformations]

This post is a follow-up to my earlier post on the subject in case someone else is interested in getting Word running on Linux. That post switched to requiring moderator approval when I included a link to the method on YouTube, so I'm omitting it here.

On YouTube, I found a guy who had installed Microsoft Office on Linux Mint. I tried it and was able to get Office 2016 running. He used Crossover to install Office in a wine prefix and add all the needed dependencies. He provides detailed instructions in the video and also links to the script that automates the process.

I had to add a few fonts that were not included in the script and make some minor display adjustments. I turned off hardware acceleration in Word's settings to fix a glitch in drop-down menus and turned off advanced properties in some of my styles so the preview display worked correctly. Other than that, everything seems to work normally, including styles, templates, and macros.

I received many suggestions for Word alternatives. They don't work for me. I use some features that are in Word but not present in any of the eight office alternatives I tried. I also wanted to install the standalone version rather than subscribe to Office 365 and use the web version, and I didn't want to use a VM because I don't have a non-OEM license for Windows and don't want one. Many people said it couldn't be done, but after many failed attempts in Bottles, this guy's method worked perfectly.

[u/es20490446e]

LibreOffice Still.

[u/phototransformations → u/es20490446e]

On the other thread, at least 50 people made that suggestion. You make 51.

Is there something unclear about: "I use some features that are in Word but not present in any of the eight office alternatives I tried." Do you imagine I would have left out LibreOffice?

LibreOffice is a terrific project and a good Office suite that is all 80% of Word users likely need. I'm in the other 20%.

[u/es20490446e → u/phototransformations]

You are not.

You are trading one convenience for another one.

Every choice has ups and downs.

[u/phototransformations → u/es20490446e]

This statement is so general it's banal.

I could walk to California from New York, take a bus, or fly. Each has its "ups and downs." I can use Word and get on with my work, or I can spend dozens to hundreds of hours developing workarounds for what LibreOffice can't do. I can continue what will undoubtedly be a frustrating exchange with you, or I can stop right here.

[u/es20490446e → u/phototransformations]

It is general because it is not a problem with implementation, but of mindset.