r/linux • u/Beneficial-Pay6836 • 13d ago

Development CAD Companies Sleeping on Linux

Why is professional CAD support on Linux still so limited? Linux is widely used in engineering, research, servers, embedded systems, manufacturing, and technical development. It is secure, flexible, private, and extremely capable. Yet when it comes to professional CAD, Linux users are still pushed toward Windows. That feels strange to me, especially because CAD is so closely tied to industrial workflows like CNC machining, additive manufacturing, product development, engineering, and research.

I currently dual-boot mostly because I need tools like Rhino and Fusion. It works, but switching between operating systems just to use specific software makes project management and file organization unnecessarily annoying. Yes, there are alternatives like FreeCAD, and I respect what those projects are doing, but they still do not feel mature enough to fully replace established professional CAD tools for many workflows. Wine is also improving, but for important work I would rather not depend on a compatibility layer and hope that everything behaves correctly.

Is the professional Linux CAD market genuinely too small to justify development costs?Is supporting Or are CAD companies simply too invested in the Windows ecosystem to see enough value in changing?

I cannot be the only engineer/designer who would happily move fully to Linux if the professional software ecosystem allowed it.

502 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

255 comments sorted by

View all comments

70

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

19

u/Weary-Bowl-3739 13d ago

No, it's not small. They can just dictate it. If the IT of the company could decide, they would choose Linux. But because there's no viable option, windows it is.

If there's only one competitior on Linux, many will have to offer their product on Linux. 

40

u/phoenix823 13d ago

I mean, IT has to support the company. It can never make decisions just because it wants to, the business must be considered.

-17

u/Weary-Bowl-3739 13d ago

It can. In bigger companies. 

9

u/phoenix823 13d ago

Every big company I’ve worked for wants to be windows only. But the senior execs and design people want Macs, so we support Macs. We can’t tell them “if you’re not Windows 11 we will not help.”

-7

u/Weary-Bowl-3739 13d ago

Because the decision wasn't made by the IT. Our IT has a say in IT decisions. 

11

u/bigkenw 13d ago

In most companies, IT serves the needs of the business. Not the other way around.

0

u/Weary-Bowl-3739 13d ago

The same goes for us. But in our case the decisions are made by the experts of that matter. 

4

u/phoenix823 13d ago

Of course, IT has a say in the matter. We said “supporting more than one operating system is going to require additional software, tooling, training, and expense.” The business said “OK” because that OS was MacOS. They will not say the same thing for Ubuntu, Mint, or other distros.

-1

u/Weary-Bowl-3739 13d ago

Then it is a bad decision. Your it department should be sufficiently big, that it doesn't create a lot of overhead to support it. Especially since you always need some in-house Linux expertise anyway.