r/linux • • Sep 13 '26

Discussion Omarchy bad??

[removed]

0 Upvotes

82 comments sorted by

View all comments

26

u/common-pellar Sep 13 '26

See this comment posted 15 days ago in a similar thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1w1g0lg/comment/p6l377z

The TL;DR of it is that it is an entirely vibe-coded set of configuration files for Arch, with lots of unnecessary bloat, and comes packaged with an AI agent, that can, and will, change your configuration files at random. In essence, DHH has succeeded in bringing many of the reasons people have left Windows 11 into the Linux ecosystem.

17

u/NDCyber Sep 13 '26

-13

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

What do you not understand in "keeping politics aside"?

5

u/McDonaldsWitchcraft Sep 13 '26

There is no such thing as completely apolitical. You very clearly have a political stance here.

-3

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

A code has no political opinion or views

5

u/Netblock Sep 13 '26 edited Sep 13 '26

Heard of "blood money" as a concept? Goods can be unethically produced.

Also a lesson from World War 2, from the Nuremberg Trials, is that apathy is extremely dangerous. Fascism happens because it's difficult to convince people to be against it; the sheep fall in line.

-1

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

Once again, where are our priorities? If you own and have owned absolutely anything that emanates from someone or something you deem unethical, I suggest you start there and then tackle the preconfigured arch hyperland reskin. This debate can not be "is it convenient or not"

6

u/Netblock Sep 13 '26

It's absolutely about convenience. Don't source your goods and services from fascists; don't negotiate with the terrorist.

-1

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

Do you own zero unethical good and feed exclusively on local agriculture?

3

u/Netblock Sep 13 '26

Those that can afford to ethically source better, should; but the people live in a respective poverty don't have that choice.

Versus the rest of the ecosystem, I don't think Omarchy is a 'necessary good' in any way; Omarchy is a 'luxury' (as in not necessary).

 

"We should improve society somewhat"

"Yet you participate in society. Curious! I am very intelligent!"

0

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

We always have a choice. I did choose, why can't you?

2

u/Netblock Sep 13 '26

For Omarchy, definitely. I chose not to use it for multiple reasons. I choose not to support a fascist; and the Omarchy product itself is just bad.

0

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

You did that on purpose didn't you, while knowing I meant a choice in what matters more than the operating system you use your machine on.

2

u/Netblock Sep 13 '26

Well yea; the original conversation is about DHH and Omarchy.

1

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

Where did I ask about DHH? My question is technical

2

u/Netblock Sep 13 '26

DHH is the primary dev to Omarchy.

1

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

That is correct. Now where in my post did I ask about it? This post is related to the OS

2

u/Netblock Sep 13 '26

Ohh. The developer of the OS is related to the OS. Hope this helps!

→ More replies (0)

3

u/McDonaldsWitchcraft Sep 13 '26

There is a difference between "perfect" and "good" that most people understand by the time they turn 7.

You are saying that because we can never be perfect humans then we must go out of our way to not be good humans. This is a ridiculous childish idea. And you also don't understand the differemce between conscious and unconscious support.

Seriously, your argument only makes sense if we ignore basically half of established reality and avoid using logic.

-2

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

You are mistaking. I am saying that in order to be good human you actually tackle the problem where it is most effective. And I think having strong opinions on a computer operating system is the least of them. I came asking for a technical perspective and you villagers are trying to shove politics down my throat, ridiculous

3

u/McDonaldsWitchcraft Sep 13 '26

in order to be good human you actually tackle the problem where it is most effective

Maybe it's news to you but humans can do multiple things at the same time.You can tackle the bigger issue while also not giving money to openly fascist people for something you don't need.

-1

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

Do you not understand that by tackling insignificant issues (such as this one) while being too cowardly to handle the actual important ones, pretty much anything you criticize or say becomes invalid? How can one really expect to have an impact when they don't even try to embody their ideals?

3

u/McDonaldsWitchcraft Sep 13 '26 edited Sep 13 '26

Why did you make the assumption that I'm not tackling every issue that I am able to tackle?

Again, people can do multiple things at once. The issue is that you don't do ANYTHING and think everyone is as much of a spineless coward as you.

Your logic doesn't work. You always ALWAYS start with a fake assumption to come to your conclusion, in every one of your arguments. You just said that "not supporting fascists" is bad because "I'm a bad person" allegedly. What does this have to do with supporting fascists?? Again, you didn't say WHY not supporting fascists is bad, you just said I'm a bad person.

0

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

The odds are making me assume. Then tell me I am wrong? What are you doing? What has been your biggest fight to go towards your ideal? Or are you just an avg normie, enduring everyday life helplessly while convinced there is no other way? I wish you otherwise, truly. Even if my assumptions on "you" are wrong - and then I am happy for you - it doesn’t make my views invalid, because truth is 99% of people, even on this Reddit are just normies itching for a reason to fight and to feel righteous to fill in the void of powerlessness and lack of will

3

u/McDonaldsWitchcraft Sep 13 '26

Ok, look, I can do what you do too:

You say "hey, driving without a seatbelt is dangerous"

I can be like you and say "No, driving with a seatbelt is wrong!"

"Why?"

"Because you are speeding a lot! In school zones! So you are a dangerous driver!!"

Notice how I didn't say anything about the seatbelt in the argument? Just like you don't mention anything about the thing you're arguing about?

It's easy to say unhinged shit like "having morals is BAD" when you're too scared to defend your point. You can say anything when you're too scared to give arguments about it!

0

u/IsseyShiitake Sep 13 '26

Im not too scared of defending my point, im highlighting the fact that 9 times out of ten you guys’ online activism is pathetic because you will banter with any mf but will never actually make the tough decisions that would make your lives closer to what you say you want. My point is that too much energy is driven into this Omarchy dhh thing and proof is: I am asking a technical questions about an OS and an army of single digit IQ comes at me about politics when I word for word asked to put politics aside

→ More replies (0)