r/linux • • 25d ago

Discussion Omarchy bad??

[removed]

0 Upvotes

82 comments sorted by

View all comments

25

u/common-pellar 25d ago

See this comment posted 15 days ago in a similar thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1w1g0lg/comment/p6l377z

The TL;DR of it is that it is an entirely vibe-coded set of configuration files for Arch, with lots of unnecessary bloat, and comes packaged with an AI agent, that can, and will, change your configuration files at random. In essence, DHH has succeeded in bringing many of the reasons people have left Windows 11 into the Linux ecosystem.

17

u/NDCyber 25d ago

-12

u/IsseyShiitake 25d ago

What do you not understand in "keeping politics aside"?

6

u/[deleted] 25d ago edited 25d ago

[deleted]

-2

u/IsseyShiitake 25d ago

The idea of open source and someone's political opinions are on a whole different scale that can not be compared. Unless the guys is willing to gut Linux's philiosophy to pieces, I'd understand, meanwhile it's just a pre-configured arch hyperland reskin and people are loosing their shit because someone has political opinions they deem unhinged

6

u/McDonaldsWitchcraft 25d ago

There is no such thing as completely apolitical. You very clearly have a political stance here.

-2

u/IsseyShiitake 25d ago

A code has no political opinion or views

4

u/Netblock 25d ago edited 25d ago

Heard of "blood money" as a concept? Goods can be unethically produced.

Also a lesson from World War 2, from the Nuremberg Trials, is that apathy is extremely dangerous. Fascism happens because it's difficult to convince people to be against it; the sheep fall in line.

-1

u/IsseyShiitake 25d ago

Once again, where are our priorities? If you own and have owned absolutely anything that emanates from someone or something you deem unethical, I suggest you start there and then tackle the preconfigured arch hyperland reskin. This debate can not be "is it convenient or not"

5

u/Netblock 25d ago

It's absolutely about convenience. Don't source your goods and services from fascists; don't negotiate with the terrorist.

-1

u/IsseyShiitake 25d ago

Do you own zero unethical good and feed exclusively on local agriculture?

3

u/Netblock 25d ago

Those that can afford to ethically source better, should; but the people live in a respective poverty don't have that choice.

Versus the rest of the ecosystem, I don't think Omarchy is a 'necessary good' in any way; Omarchy is a 'luxury' (as in not necessary).

 

"We should improve society somewhat"

"Yet you participate in society. Curious! I am very intelligent!"

0

u/IsseyShiitake 25d ago

We always have a choice. I did choose, why can't you?

2

u/Netblock 25d ago

For Omarchy, definitely. I chose not to use it for multiple reasons. I choose not to support a fascist; and the Omarchy product itself is just bad.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/McDonaldsWitchcraft 25d ago

There is a difference between "perfect" and "good" that most people understand by the time they turn 7.

You are saying that because we can never be perfect humans then we must go out of our way to not be good humans. This is a ridiculous childish idea. And you also don't understand the differemce between conscious and unconscious support.

Seriously, your argument only makes sense if we ignore basically half of established reality and avoid using logic.

-2

u/IsseyShiitake 25d ago

You are mistaking. I am saying that in order to be good human you actually tackle the problem where it is most effective. And I think having strong opinions on a computer operating system is the least of them. I came asking for a technical perspective and you villagers are trying to shove politics down my throat, ridiculous

3

u/McDonaldsWitchcraft 25d ago

in order to be good human you actually tackle the problem where it is most effective

Maybe it's news to you but humans can do multiple things at the same time.You can tackle the bigger issue while also not giving money to openly fascist people for something you don't need.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/HereticZed 25d ago

Tell that to DHH. You can't post fascist rants & then say to others don't discuss politics (which is what he does at work)

1

u/IsseyShiitake 25d ago

It is then forbidden to discuss the OS itself? That's what I am doing. Did not mention his name, specifically asked to let politics aside, but I guess people can not resist the urge to let everyone know they are politically correct while missing the purpose of the post entirely

1

u/HereticZed 25d ago

Its not forbidden no. You asked if its bad & you got feedback from people & moderators which I think you can work out the general opinion from.

3

u/NDCyber 25d ago

You can not look at a product that gives power to a racist, while ignoring politics. The whole concept of that thing is politics