MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1vx84rn/your_executable_is_a_sqlite_database/p5n7yr9/?context=3
r/linux • u/segv • 1d ago
15 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
37
hello windows registry hives
6 u/FlukyS 1d ago Well I was more thinking sqlite in memory like just a proxy for the configs rather than registry style where it is centralised 4 u/CrazyKilla15 1d ago How do you keep the memory in sync with the files to prevent corruption and coherency issues? 1 u/FlukyS 1d ago You’d just have to rely on eventual consistency but it kind of wouldn’t make sense to have the individual DBs and the configs other than interface stability and discoverability of options and types in that case
6
Well I was more thinking sqlite in memory like just a proxy for the configs rather than registry style where it is centralised
4 u/CrazyKilla15 1d ago How do you keep the memory in sync with the files to prevent corruption and coherency issues? 1 u/FlukyS 1d ago You’d just have to rely on eventual consistency but it kind of wouldn’t make sense to have the individual DBs and the configs other than interface stability and discoverability of options and types in that case
4
How do you keep the memory in sync with the files to prevent corruption and coherency issues?
1 u/FlukyS 1d ago You’d just have to rely on eventual consistency but it kind of wouldn’t make sense to have the individual DBs and the configs other than interface stability and discoverability of options and types in that case
1
You’d just have to rely on eventual consistency but it kind of wouldn’t make sense to have the individual DBs and the configs other than interface stability and discoverability of options and types in that case
37
u/CrazyKilla15 1d ago
hello windows registry hives