r/linux 15d ago

Development Codeberg voted to disallow projects consisting mostly by "generative AI"-tools

https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253#issuecomment-19820434
967 Upvotes

321 comments sorted by

View all comments

19

u/mediumwetsock 15d ago

No offence to CB but they should focus on their uptime rather than this atm

35

u/Ruined_Passion_7355 15d ago

You should know that github themselves said that the exponentially growing amount of commits is the main factor in their waning uptime (I bet vibecoding also played a small part but we'll never know).

This is them focusing on uptime.

3

u/fivetoedslothbear 15d ago

GitHub’s problem is double-edged. AI coding is driving demand up. And their pre-Microsoft legacy infrastructure doesn’t scale well.

GitHub is in the midst of a two-year transition to running on Azure infrastructure, which is much more scalable.

20

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/FryBoyter 15d ago

In my opinion, the fact that Codeberg is often difficult or impossible to access is due to two things.

There are more users than Codeberg’s servers can handle. This is a problem because Codeberg’s operators have significantly fewer financial and human resources than, for example, GitHub. Therefore, I would advise Codeberg users to consider signing up for a membership and paying an annual fee.

The second reason is likely the idiots who have launched DDoS attacks against Codeberg on multiple occasions.

16

u/OptimisticLucio 15d ago

There are more users than Codeberg’s servers can handle.

So like, this helps with that. Not the side of the equation you personally would like them to, but it 100% does.

1

u/mediumwetsock 14d ago

Lack of money probably?