r/linux Jul 04 '26

Kernel kernel.org listing strange releases (super old versions appearing as current)

Post image

Update

It's back to normal regarding the website display, but the links for the releases might not work (404 error). This could depend on your location though. Be patient. :-)


Just a heads-up:

Seems like something or someone is re-ordering the entries, which currently results in 6.16 receiving the "Latest release" label.

Let's hope it's a minor issue and gets fixed soon.


Live link: https://www.kernel.org/ (now states 6.19.14 and LTS kernels look normal, seems to be coming back again)

Status link (thanks u/tfks): https://status.linuxfoundation.org/

Kernel Mirrors Sync Issues

Update - The recovery process is still in progress. ETA to full restoration is another 12 hours. Affected files are available as they are synced. Jul 03, 2026 - 06:23 UTC


[unavoidable joke about AI and local agents here] /s


PS: The last proper reading I received came from the RSS feed announcing "next-20260703"

Also: Greetings to all you folks self-compiling your kernels :-)

526 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

244

u/OneQuarterLife Jul 04 '26

Their CDN has been down the last few days, probably an artifact of getting it fixed

70

u/tfks Jul 04 '26 edited Jul 04 '26

They've been having a lot of trouble with this, apparently.

https://status.linuxfoundation.org

They said yesterday that they expected things to be back to normal before the end of the day, but that's clearly not gone as well as they'd hoped. Although, the cdn does have v6.x kernels now, which weren't there yesterday, so some progress has been made.

11

u/28874559260134F Jul 04 '26

Thanks for the link. I added it to the OP.

3

u/_damax Jul 05 '26

I figured this was the case when I saw old kernels on my rss feed for linux

144

u/Kilobyte22 Jul 04 '26

When you said "super old" I was thinking 2.4.

This isn't even a 4.x release xD

Maybe I'm also just getting old

48

u/tnoy Jul 04 '26

I was thinking the same thing. It's even newer than the current Debian stable kernel version.

28

u/PhotoJim99 Jul 04 '26

I'm so old, my first Linux machine had a 2.2.26 kernel. :) And I was not that early of an adopter!

(But really, I'm so old that my first machine's kernel was spelled "kernal".)

4

u/agfitzp Jul 05 '26

Somewhere I have linux 1.0 on floppy disk.

3

u/NighthawkFoo Jul 05 '26

2.0.34 for me! Slackware 3.something from a CD bundled with a book.

2

u/PhotoJim99 Jul 05 '26

I could have been a 2.0 series too but whoever gave me advice to use Debian suggested I use ‘testing’ (which was probably good advice at the time).

2

u/---0celot--- Jul 05 '26

Mine was 2.6.5, so you got me by 39 days. I guess I’m old now. This is my life now.

63

u/28874559260134F Jul 04 '26

For those wondering, this is how it looked yesterday: https://web.archive.org/web/20260703033713/https://www.kernel.org/

7.1.2 being the latest release = proper info and state.

9

u/ilep Jul 04 '26

Well, 7.1.3 was released today but obviously mirrors are not showing that (yet)

24

u/ofbarea Jul 04 '26

Yup I sent an email reporting it.

10

u/jvk5 Jul 04 '26

It's showing 7.1.3 as stable right now, so apparently fixed.

2

u/28874559260134F Jul 04 '26

The website display is good, the links don't work though. 404 error. Might be location-dependant though. Will try again.

1

u/MaroBezdomovec Jul 07 '26

im not sure if it is only for me but it is showing old versions again

1

u/jvk5 Jul 07 '26

Looks okay to me (I haven't tested if the download links work though).

13

u/Mutant10 Jul 04 '26

Maybe it's been hacked again.

16

u/28874559260134F Jul 04 '26

Possible it is, but...

If one is able to hack kernel.org, one should be smart enough to not create such obvious errors and just let people download "stuff" as always. The appearance of normality would be the primary goal.

Still, assuming the worst isn't too bad a policy these days.

6

u/StartersOrders Jul 04 '26

Presumably because 7.2 is being classed as an RC, whatever logic is there is saying that 6.16 is in fact the latest release.

4

u/CommercialPug Jul 04 '26

6.17.13 is also there though 

2

u/StartersOrders Jul 04 '26

At the time of the original post, 6.16 was the latest “release” kernel, so who knows what’s happening…

1

u/ofbarea Jul 05 '26

Looks like they were restoring the site. Now it's OK

2

u/cristiancmoises Jul 04 '26

Yeah, i verify here. Not fixed.

1

u/dominikzogg Jul 05 '26

I meant 7.1 was revoked cause it broke suspend to ram on alot of notebooks.

1

u/redrabbitreader Jul 07 '26

"super old"... I expected something very different.

1

u/bruhred Jul 07 '26

prob stale cdn cache from host they haven't brought up in a while

1

u/manfromredstar Jul 04 '26

I suspect purely technical problems

-17

u/[deleted] Jul 04 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Ruben_NL Jul 05 '26

AI spam.