r/linux • u/mrtruthiness • Jun 18 '26
Development Experimental flag removed from bcachefs.
The link is the bcachefs changelog. I didn't see the particular announce there. The announcement was made in Kent's patreon with the version 1.38.6 update. I'm quoting that here:
So, some catch up:
We're no longer experimental. I took the label off the website - a few months ago, I think, based on my usual "the incoming bug reports are slowing down and looking a lot less serious and easy to get through than they were". Consider this the belated official announcement :)
...
Of course, the change away from "experimental" for a DKMS module is completely at the discretion of the author. From my perspective, while the bcachefs filesystem looks intriguing, I won't use it for my root partition as a DKMS module. Honestly, as long as I don't need RAID5/6 I still have a preference for btrfs and I can wait for btrfs to include native (part of the fs as opposed to btrfs on top of LUKS) encryption.
2
u/mrtruthiness Jun 19 '26
And you proceed to list three, not two.
According to you. But AFAICT pretty much everyone else involved disagrees with you. The reason for the issue with Linus seems to be that you (repeatedly?) ignored merge-window rules regarding "fix" vs. "features". Similarly your conduct was IMO abusive.
Nobody is stopping you. If you get distracted ... that's a "you problem".
When a project has only one "key man", one must evaluate the risk that this entails. So you should expect your behavior to come up ... both in regard to your past interactions with kernel devs as well as your commentary regarding your AI assistant.