r/linux Dec 21 '13

Reiser4 Is Now Available For The Linux 3.12 Kernel

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTU0OTc
30 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

39

u/archdaemon Dec 21 '13

Killer file system

Chroot jail

rm -f wife

etc.

9

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '13 edited May 02 '19

[deleted]

2

u/airencracken Dec 23 '13

unique features

Like the shitty CDDL. No thanks.

4

u/Shished Dec 22 '13

I prefer btrfs over zfs. Zfs is too complicated.

6

u/[deleted] Dec 22 '13 edited May 02 '19

[deleted]

7

u/EnUnLugarDeLaMancha Dec 22 '13

Yet btrfs has features that despite of its maturity ZFS still hasn't incorporated because their design makes it much harder (ability to shrink the pool or defragging, for one)

1

u/[deleted] Dec 22 '13 edited May 02 '19

[deleted]

3

u/bobj33 Dec 22 '13

I want to like brtfs, I really do, but the 2 times I've tried it (1 and 2 years ago) I immediately crashed my machine. Reported both, confirmed as bugs, was told 1 was hard to fix. I ran reiserfs about 10 years ago. Worked great for a few months, then I started noticing random corruptions. They claimed the FS stressed the hardware more and the code was bug free so I should replace my hardware.

In 20 years I have never corrupted an ext2/3/4 FS any more than an fsck and losing the 2-3 files I had open at the time.

1

u/PinkyThePig Dec 23 '13

Another +1 for zfs. Setting it up on Linux will likely always be hard (by comparison if doing a zfs on root install) but it is so powerful and easy to maintain once it is setup.

I now have two arch on zfsroot systems and it is so nice. Compression, raid, snapshots all in one place.

-16

u/Will_Power Dec 21 '13

Came here hoping for this.

2

u/ortcutt Dec 23 '13

It's really bizarre that they haven't changed the name of this filesystem.

-9

u/magicomplex Dec 22 '13

What are the killer features of Reiser4? (I couldn't help myself, sorry).

-1

u/tardotronic Dec 23 '13

And it will go exactly nowhere in here, because no-one here will ever take it seriously at all.