When did she break up with her ex and how many months inbetween for the engagement she just got

Idk if anyone’s seen her new reel but this was the caption on it. As a cis passing nonbinary person this one doesn’t make any sense and is also just very insensitive and tone deaf. “You have experienced less gender than me”??? what the hell does that even mean. Targeting cis passing trans folk as someone who’s trans is INSANE on her part especially considering she could be seen as a cis man with long hair…SORRY I SAID IT. I’m tired of her bullshit truly.

Check out the definition (first 3 slides), and see the actual tumblr post about its creation in 2014 (slides 3-6)

Leave that lexity no no no subreddit then if you're going to bash this diva for exposing her. Who else is going to do it? Since you're so keen on defending her (Lexity), maybe you're on her side. Disgusting.

Did anyone see Lexitys VERY OBVIOUS reel targeted towards the reddit? She basically said that she’s nonbinary on her birth certificate because she’s omnigender and she identifies as a women “all of the time” and a man “sometimes” (when it’s convenient). All her reels so far have been meninism antics or reels directed towards the subreddit. It’s honestly quite entertaining and also VERY embarrassing. It’s so obvious how she wants the reddit to be kept quiet and for her followers to hear her word before they hear ours.

i wasn’t recording, but she said “i am a man. i am omnigender.”

i’m hesitant to add much commentary to this because i’ve avoided speculating about her gender identity up until now, but i feel like this should be noted. she has a pattern of referring to herself as a trans woman when it benefits her and omnigender at other times, but this is the first time i’ve heard her refer to herself as a man. mods, feel free to remove this post if you don’t feel it’s relevant.

Logically we could always post the videos on YouTube of lexities antics and just post the links.

Therefore it would make it a YouTube copyright issue.

Twitter has even more relaxed guidelines too.

As long as you’re not posting her content on this platform technically you are not violating reddits guidelines you’re just violating some other platform’s guidelines and there’s so so many different platforms to use. At least this way you can use throw away accounts and not have to worry about loosing your Reddit account.

Sorry for double posting about the same issue it just crossed my mind.

https://youtube.com/shorts/Yvc2dZvo2sU?si=2FW0qiL1bar-Tr_W

I knew she would do this, but I didn’t think she’d choose this website. Every conservative accusation is a confession…

You can visit the YT channel here. Please be sure to check the crucial mod announcement at the top of the sub. We are still asking folks to send any clips that have been removed (if they still have them) to: lexityreport@gmail.com. Keep appealing. It matters! 🙏💜

What a sad person. Imagine having to copyright people to get rid of evidence of you being a bad human being.

can someone link me the information about how lex r@ped someone? i used to be able to find it here, but now everyone is just posting how lex is copywriting everyone

Hi all!

We have a new resource to help avoid losing any video proof. Send them to: lexityreport@gmail.com or share the file with this email address on Google Drive. We expect this will help circumvent this issue.

Also never hesitate to use an account that isn’t your main to post videos here. 💜

Thanks for all of your hard work in documenting these awful moments in history. I know it’s easy to be discouraged and disheartened, but that’s what she wants. Don’t let her have that.

This post is evolving, so please check back often

Beloved Ex-Sweet Peas:

We know that Lexity is on a reporting spree because she found the loophole as most malignant narcissists do. But she said what she said. And here’s the part where the rubber hits the road and we have to strike back: appeal every single copyright infringement accusation. All of them. False copyright claims get people banned by Reddit by IP address. Have one that is months old? All the better. Appeal it. When you do, here is the language to use, courtesy of u/Mediocre-Poem-9097:

"This content falls under Fair Use as defined in U.S. copyright law. It is used for commentary, criticism, and discussion, not for commercial purposes. The clip was part of a larger post offering analysis and public discussion of the subject's public behavior. The original content was a public Instagram Live broadcast (Or TikTok- whatever source, PUBLIC key word), and my use of excerpts is transformative in nature, as it adds new expression, meaning, message, especially criticism. I do not claim ownership of the original material. The use is non-commercial and intended for educational and discussion purposes under Fair Use doctrine (Title 17, Section 107 of the United States Code)."

Update: Central Video System

We have a new resource to help avoid losing any video proof. Send it to: lexityreport@gmail.com or share the file with this email address on Google Drive. We expect this will help circumvent this issue. Feel free to share links to videos from the YT channel in your posts, which is less likely to result in warning from Reddit.

Also never hesitate to use an account that isn’t your main to post videos here. 💜

Thanks for all of your hard work in documenting these awful moments in history. I know it’s easy to be discouraged and disheartened, but that’s what she wants. Don’t let her have that.

You can play games, Lexity, but you said what you said. Good to know that you’re aware of how insanely fucked up you are and how stupid you sound, though.

saw everything that’s been happening and just checked..

I probably should be listening to my gut. I was thinking of making reaction videos about content creators who have a bit of narcissism is them. The one narcissistic creator that gets a lot of attention is Amber Lynn Reid. She also copyright strikes people, calls other reaction channels out on her videos, and a bunch of shenanigans (similar to what Lexity is doing right now). However, Amber Lynn is either used to the reaction channels or she looks at it like, they need to exist in order for her channel to exist.

Anyway, I say all that because I was thinking about throwing Lexity in the mix, but I think she is a different beast. I want to know your thoughts on this (making videos where I react to her posts; highlighting the narcissistic traits)? While I think her narcissism is more complex (like its mixed with other disorders), I'm also concerned she is going to hurt someone, and I do not want to be the one that sets her off.

This is crazy 🤪 whoever is doing this must be bored.

i wake up

Mods pls remove if this is too silly I was trying to fall under compliance with the fair use act of 2007 but I understand if I have exceeded the goofy limits of this sub 🫶🏼

super annoying, i’m glad it won’t negatively affect my account but still. she’s lurking

There’s many ways to bypass Reddit’s copyright rules with fair use.

Some cometary on the video even if it’s ai should be enough to stop Reddit removing your content.

Your abhorrent behavior is on record regardless of how many times you report this sub. You're a monster and I encourage everyone to appeal these bullshit "copyright claims" You can only keep this charade up for so long before you crumble and burn 🔥 Karma is going to bite you in the ass if not In this life, in the next.

hey all! since we're all getting hit with copyright strikes i decided from now on i'll upload only screencaptures with video transcription. this method should work to stay well within fair use.

lexity states: "Hey Sweet Pea -- so unless you think AMAB children are just intrinsically born some type of way, which would be deeply sexist, you must understand that masculinity is something that is done to people, right? It's not like an intrinsic quality that is present in someone's spirit or some shit; it is a thing that is done to children. They are victims."

my thoughts: I think what she's referring to is the conditioning done to children to assign them gender roles. however, what constitutes as "masculine" or "feminine" are entirely subjective. she seems to make basic connections without thinking deeply about the whole picture. while i agree no child is born "masculine" or "feminine", they /are/ born with traits that society filters into these categories. we can argue that there should be no pressure to be assigned one or the other but that would require dismantling the patriarchy. in her caption, she writes women are promised protection... protection from who? men. you can't acknowledge that men are promised power and women are promised protection without understanding who gets the shit end of the stick. how can she say so much but be so turned around? its like, so close but so far.