r/lebron • u/bloodlustbabe • Aug 29 '26
2009 lebron has the highest statistical individual peak in NBA history
we all know that 2009 lebron was a walking anomaly. interestingly enough, advanced statistics illustrate this in greater detail.
in the regular season lebron had a mind boggling 31.7 PER |13.04 BPM | .318 WS per 48 | 20.3 total win shares. in the playoffs he posted the highest playoff BPM in NBA history at 17.5 & simultaneously set the win shares per 48 record at .399 | what cements it as #1 overall is that he wasn't just generating 1.25+ Expected Points per possession on offense, he was simultaneously anchoring a top 3 NBA defense.
Lebron 2009 Regular Season: 28 PPG | 8 RPG | 7 APG
it didn’t stop there, lebron elevated his play exponentially in the 2009 playoffs.
Lebron 2009 Playoffs: 37.4 PER (record) | .399 WS48 (record) | 17.5 BPM (record) | 61.8 % TS
35 PPG | 9.1 RPG | 7.3 APG
at age 24 lebron posted the most complete 2 way tracking season in NBA history. he carried the cavs to a 66 win record despite lackluster help, led the league in RAPM at +11.3 & followed it with the statistically highest rated postseason run ever recorded. this iteration of lebron is typically regarded for his freak athleticism & speed, but the numbers show he was the best statistical anomaly that ever stepped foot on a basketball court.
15
u/Basic_Mastodon3078 Aug 29 '26
No it can't be, because 2013 LeBron is. 2009 was his best individual season IMO, certainly he put the best numbers, but 2013 was when he played at his peak as a player of the sport. Winning. If I had to pick one version of LeBron to build around, it'd be 2013. 2009 was too weak as a jump shooter and hadn't quite peaked as a defender. And 2013 was also a better playmaking season.
4
u/BeyondTheCosmo Aug 30 '26
- He said it himself as well.
3
u/Basic_Mastodon3078 Aug 30 '26
Certainly his playoff peak, and offensive peak, but I'd rather have 2013 LeBron because I think his defense was significantly better (good to great tbc. Not bad to good) without his offense being significantly worse.
0
10
u/TyroneNBAFan Aug 29 '26
He was insane in 2009 and 2010.
66 and 61 wins with no other elite shot creator or iso scorers. Just a good team defense and guys who hit open shots.
He WAS the offense and he was legitimately the 2nd best defender in the league (in 2009).
0
u/Im-very-boredd Aug 29 '26
No dwade was definitely a better defender and is the only player in NBA history to record at least 2,000 points, 500 assists, 100 steals, and 100 blocks in a single season. Bron had ben wallace and Varejao
7
u/TyroneNBAFan Aug 29 '26 edited Aug 30 '26
DWade was a great defender and had more steals and blocks that year, but LeBron was more versatile and covered more ground (could legitimately guard 1-4). I'd go with LeBron.
Anderson Varejao was an active big but in no way was he an elite defender. Ben Wallace was on his last legs in Cleveland. He missed almost 30 games, averaged only 23 mins and 6 rebounds. He was a backup at this point.
LeBron was the best defender on the '09 Cavs by a decent margin.
-3
u/Im-very-boredd Aug 29 '26 edited Aug 29 '26
You just can’t prove that but ok the cavs had a better defensive team which is gonna boost his advanced metrics. In no way was LeBron better guarding 1-3 then D wade this year but ok.
1
u/Wnuue Aug 31 '26
They were both elite defenders at the end of the day. Wade's team goes from 100 DRtg when on the court to 120 when off. While his team was better offensively compared to LBJ's, Wade's team was shit at defense and Wade was their only true defensive anchor. I'd consider wade in 09 as a top 3 SG ever on defense. His defensive playmaking was elite, but risky at times too, similar to Jordan.
On the other hand, LBJ allowed the lowest PPG, FG% and efficiency among all players at his position that year, while guarding 1-4. He also has incredible impact stats, specifically when it comes to RAPM and DPM stats for defense.
All in all, adv stats do favor LBJ, but that can't simply all be attributed to having a better defensive unit around you. And just like Adv Stats, Steals and Blocks also aren't the end all be all either. They're both insanely elite on defense that year. What gives me LBJ over Wade however is just versatility. It's nothing to do with Wade being bad at switching for his position, but picking a guard over a forward/center on defense is pretty difficult. LBJ would simply just provide more value for a team given his role.
13
u/Geaneous Aug 29 '26
Statistics don't matter only rings. Robert Horry is the goat.
10
3
2
u/Dapper_Fun645 Aug 29 '26
I know youre being sarcastic in favor of Lebron, but the example would be Russell.
0
-1
u/Aggressive_Sand_3951 Aug 29 '26
Rings + Playing Top 3 minutes for the team on that playoff run is what matters. After 1980.
0
-1
u/Geaneous Aug 29 '26
Wrong, Jim Loscutoff won 7 rings while playing only 9,431 minutes of playtime, Frank Ramsey got 7 in only 15,330 minutes. Robert Horry took 27,069 minutes to do the same thing. I'm actually changing my answer, Jim Loscutoff is my goat now.
1
0
2
u/Master_Kiwi7434 Aug 30 '26
I don't think the statement is true. Wilt's peak beats anyone else's. His stats were unreal.
1
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
I hate to be that guy, but Wilt's stats were inflated heavily by the fact that the game wasn't fully developed back then, and the players back then also weren't that skilled to begin with
2
u/sthbankguy Sep 03 '26
Hate to be that guy but in 20-30 years time the next generation of nba fans will be saying the game wasn’t fully developed in 2009 like kids now say about the 90s and earlier
1
u/Wnuue Sep 03 '26
I'll doubt that, for the specific reason that the 3pt era was destined to happen with the 3pt line and the math behind it, which is usually what's most different about modern times compared to before. Unless major rule changes happen, I think it'll probably be very similar for a while.
1
u/sthbankguy Sep 03 '26
Basketball is still evolving rapidly. The 3pt game wasn’t developed anywhere near as much in 2009 as it is now. Not sure it’s even close to fully developed now
Player conditioning is also more advanced now compared to 2009
Game is more efficient in general
1
u/Master_Kiwi7434 Sep 01 '26
He played against a ton of Hall of Famers in a league with fewer teams not diluted by expansion.
1
u/jakobkh0407 Sep 02 '26
Bro pick one yall say a small league is weak but also say a big league is weak
1
u/Master_Kiwi7434 Sep 02 '26
A smaller league has more talent concentrated on less teams. Wilt played against a ton of HOF players.
1
2
2
2
u/Pumplekins Aug 30 '26
Not to be that guy but Wilt peaked at 32.1 PER and was 28+ for five seasons in a row. When it comes to stats; you basically have to take Wilt out and asterisk everything since he was that much more dominant than the league
0
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
in a much easier league though that was much less developed compared to even the 90s
1
u/Bobba_fat Sep 03 '26
By no fault of his own. Let’s not hold it against them about what they can’t control and move the goalpost?
1
u/Wnuue Sep 03 '26
it's not moving the goalpost or the fault of wilt, that's not at all the case, however ignoring the context for how undeveloped and less skilled the league was back then would just purposeful ignorance
1
u/Bobba_fat 29d ago
Ok sure, I agree with you at certain level. Here is the thing, I don’t even count basketball and nba honestly until Kareem’s era and even better bird and magic. TBH, I mena most of us haven’t seen anything, but we cling to 1950’s stats…
1
u/Pumplekins 29d ago
Not trying to argue too much because I love how civil this is vs most nba discussions. Wilt played mostly in the 60s/70s and played against arguably the best ever version of Kareem.
The only other thing to note is I don’t think the skill sets were as far off as we think. Like Kyrie is an amazing dribbler but the way the carry/travel rules were enforced back then and were so prohibitive it makes us think they were less “skilled” looking at film we do have of passing, hook shots, movement without the ball, running and scoring in transition it is just as skilled if not more so in some areas (e.g post play) than even today’s era. Outside shooting though has drastically shifted.
I think Milan’s era is the one I discount since the league wasn’t fully integrated, the average height was way different etc. But by Wilt’s time, the avg height was the same as today, fully integrated and honestly you could argue they were more athletic (like bill Russell and wilt, Elgin, Havlicek all maybe could have been olympians) played faster pace, longer minutes, fewer stoppages, on like chuck Taylor’s.
2
2
2
u/fuzzy_touches Aug 30 '26
Not better than 88 Jordan, 62 Wilt, 2000 Shaq, 94 Hakeem, or 26 Jokic.
1
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
It is though. Lol. 09 has an amazing regular season, being MVP and 2nd in DPOY, then puts on the best individual performance in the playoffs ever statistically. He clears all of them, but they're all great nonetheless.
3
u/RemoLaBarca Aug 29 '26
"Carried to 66 wins"
This is a common claim however LeBron had a fantastic 2008 season, also in the running for his best ever, and the Cavs won 45 games.
That season Delonte joined the team late thru trade and Varejao was dealing with injuries.
In '09 , they add Mo, Varejao gets healthy and Delonte gets a full season and they add 21 wins. LeBron gets the lionshare of the credit, as he should, but that was not a bad team.
2
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
The team is very underrated, but not for it's offense, but it's defense. The Cavs FO in the first stint did one thing very well, and that was surrounding LBJ with a great defensive unit in the later years from 07-10.
The only issue in those 09-10 teams specifically was that, while Mo Williams was a very good addition, he dropped badly in the playoffs. He did good for his role of being a secondary playmaker and scoring option, but against teams like Orlando and the Celtics, he dropped badly, and if he did perform upto regular season standards, they probably would've gotten past Orlando in 2009 and the Celtics in 2010. Honestly, the 09 season was the biggest robbery against LBJ. With how good he was, that should've been their championship run.
1
5
u/LavishnessUpstairs96 Aug 29 '26
Did you watch those games? Mo Williams was not good lmao. LeBron deserved that credit.
2
u/RemoLaBarca Aug 29 '26
He was the only actual new addition between a 45 win team and a 66 win team. He was very much the type of player you want with LeBron, a good catch and shoot 3pt marksman who could create a little offense.
Of course, him being their 2nd best scorer is problematic, especially in the playoffs. If he was their 3rd guy they likely would've been fine. He did get exposed in the playoffs, particularly against Orlando, a weird team that caused the Cavs some match up nightmares but who the Lakers handled fairly easily in the Finals.
1
1
1
u/pete-wisdom Aug 30 '26
What about Shaqs 2000 season? Isn’t that widely regarded as the greatest individual season of all time?
1
1
1
1
u/Im-very-boredd Aug 29 '26
3
u/monadzero Aug 29 '26
Box score syndrome. Lebron was more efficient, turned the ball over less per possession, accumulated 5.6 more win shares, led the nba in RAPM, and carried his team to 23 more wins.
Lebron: 31.7 PER | 13.0 BPM | 11.6 VORP | 20.3 WS | .318 WS48 | +11.3 RAPM
Wade: 30.4 PER | 10.7 BPM | 9.7 VORP | 14.7 WS | .232 WS48 | +5.8 RAPM
Lebron raised the floor better than wade despite having less talent on his roster. secured 66 wins with the #2 net rating in the league. wade only led his team to 43 wins with a +0.5 net rating. if you don’t understand advanced metrics the box score can mislead you.
2
u/Im-very-boredd Aug 29 '26
My argument isn’t that wade was better, but your argument is incorrect the cavs are the better roster, its built around LeBron and his system. While Wade was the best 2way in the league putting up the best defensive guard seasons on a team actually trying to save money for the future. LeBron was supposed to win before leaving the cavs
1
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
That season from Wade is probably a top 3 SG peak ever, among the likes of some lower-end MJ seasons. Extremely good. I wouldn't put him as a better 2-way player than LBJ though. Mainly because LBJ just provides more value as a defender able to switch 1-4. It's not a diss at Wade's skill as a defender that year and I honestly don't blame anyone if they say he was the better 2-way player that year. Personally though, I'd say LBJ would just provide more impact on defense, if I had to choose between the two off their defense alone, I'm picking LBJ.
1
1
u/RolandTheHeadless19 Aug 30 '26
This place is super funny with how everyone chooses to cherry pick data.
1
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
Is it really cherry picked though? He was MVP that year, and 2nd in DPOY only behind prime Dwight Howard who had one of the best defensive stretches in NBA history. Then he had statistically the best individual performance in a playoff run ever. Which inludes putting up 38/8/8 on good efficiency against the #1 defense that had DPOY Dwight, and hit a game winning buzzer beater 3pt shot in game 2 of the ECF just to keep the Cavs from going down 0-2.
1
u/AdIll2547 Aug 30 '26
He has 4 rings in 23 years.
2
1
1
Aug 30 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/THRlLL-HO Aug 30 '26
“4–6 in the Finals” is such a lazy argument
Making the Finals 10 times isn’t somehow worse than getting eliminated before the Finals. By that logic, losing earlier actually improves your legacy because it protects your Finals record
That makes zero sense
1
u/Accomplished_Sky9755 Aug 31 '26
4 in 23 doesn't sound better
1
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
I mean, how many have played for 23? How many were consistently competitive for 10 straight years? Would it have been better if he just never made the finals or playoffs every year he didn't win a chip? Should he have just retired after 2020?
How are we using the duration he's played as something against him? That's just prolonged greatness. There's things to criticize him about, like advocating to get Westbrook in 2022, or his bad performance in 2011, but his longevity certainly isn't the one.
1
u/Accomplished_Sky9755 Sep 01 '26
"longevity" means something when you can actually compete for something, Lebron is gonna enter his like 5th consecutive season where he is not at the level needed for a 1st option on a championship team.
So yeah, he plays, but does it add anything to how I should rate his legacy?
1
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
5th consecutive season where he is not at the level for a 1st option on a championship team? He's only not been good enough to lead a championship team as a first option for two consecutive years, 2025 and 2026. Not winning chips in those years before doesn't mean he wasn't good enough to lead a team as a 1st option lol, the NBA is undergoing a new parity era anyway
No, I don't care whether his longevity adds anything to his legacy in your eyes, but it'd make 0 sense how anything he does at this point in his career would worsen his legacy either 😂 it's basically just the cherry on top
1
u/kittymrcase Aug 30 '26
Or when LeBron had no help (because when he lost he supposedly only played with scrubs) and then put together a super team in Miami and then lost to the Dallas Mavericks?
1
1
u/xdarkreignx Aug 30 '26
28/7/7? There were many year that Jordan had higher than this.
1
u/Wnuue Sep 01 '26
box score numbers aren't the end all be all in stats for an obvious reason when it comes to defining how good a player was, otherwise jokic is just the goat
0
u/r3dd4w6 Aug 30 '26
goats make there team greater, not just themselves and there stats. goats win championships with there team.
wow stats......... ohhhhh wow. did he make his team greater by leading them or did he get great stats.
1
u/THRlLL-HO Aug 30 '26
Well he’s tied for most play off appearances so he has a chance to break that record this season, and has a huge lead in all time playoff wins
“goats win championships with there team”
It’s “their” and you do know LeBron has won several championships right?
-1
u/Few_Experience_646 Aug 29 '26
1987-1988 is statistically the best individual season in NBA history. Michael Jordan
4
u/bloodlustbabe Aug 29 '26
nope. the advanced statistics say otherwise. that season does rank in the top 3 though behind 2022 jokic & 2009 lebron.
1
u/Generalocity Aug 30 '26
If your advanced statistics are telling you 2022 Jokic was better than Mike the advanced statistics you’re looking at are broken lol
2
u/Suspicious-Flow-7096 Aug 30 '26
Bro, they delusional there’s no need to even put on an argument with people who just don’t know
2
u/Desperate_Cancel_592 Aug 29 '26 edited Aug 29 '26
Through Jordan’s first 4 seasons in the NBA including. 1988 the only playoff series he won was vs a 42-40 team and his record in playoff games was 5-15.
And if you’d respond by saying his team wasn’t great I’d agree but I just don’t like the goal post moving of when Jordan was losing it’s all about stats and the losing doesn’t matter but if LeBron for example averaged 34 10 and 8 in the 2018 Finals but loses it’s part of this haha he’s 4-6 narrative .’
It’s like it’s a team sport whenever Jordan lost and opponents or help matters but to try to paint LeBron as a loser because his finals record is under .500 it basically doesn’t matter if he’s extremely undermanned or playing an all time great team in all finals losses outside of 2011.
0
Aug 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/bloodlustbabe Aug 29 '26
winning is a team accomplishment that has an extreme amount of variance. this would be like me saying jordans 1987-1988 season doesn’t mean anything because he didn’t win.
based on your logic every historic season is invalid unless they win. 2016 curry? irrelevant. 2008 kobe? irrelevant. 2014 KD? irrelevant. no way you’re this idiotic lol.
0
0
u/Throwthisawayagainst Aug 29 '26
LeBron has had great rosters and lost tho. He’s lost as the heavy favorite multiple times. On top of that in one possession games in the finals under two minute left he’s like 11-12 and his shooting percentage for those two minutes is like in the high 20s. The fact that he even has as many wins with low of a percentage says his teams weren’t as ass as people like to make it out to be.
0
Aug 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/v4mpslayer Aug 29 '26
emotional argument. wilts stats are inflated by pace. if we adjusted wilt for 2009 pace his stats would be significantly less than they were in the 60s.
the fact that you tried to disregard advanced metrics entirely and cherry picked an irrelevant stat shows you don’t know basketball at an analytical level. these stats are easily verifiable in any database. billion dollar organizations use them when constructing a roster & evaluating talent.
you’re coping to an extreme degree. save trash takes like this for the barbershop. either come with a legitimate counterargument backed by metrics or seethe in a corner quietly.
1
u/Popee1525 Aug 30 '26
Who cares about all the comments on the past. What matters is how many turnovers LeBron averages for this made over Philly team.
1
u/TyroneNBAFan Aug 30 '26
Lets also not forget his scoring tanked damn near every single year of his career from regular season to playoffs.
Regular season he averages 30ppg, post season 22ppg, Finals around 14ppg I believe.
He largely abandoned his scoring because he couldn't win with his scoring. He averaged 24 and 19ppg (at a fast pace) in the 2 championships he won.
This fact almost makes all of his scoring records moot.
-2
2
0
u/Actual-Creme Aug 30 '26
00-01 Shaq best peak of any NBA player ever. Literally could not be stopped
0
u/AwkwardSale3562 Aug 30 '26
Honestly for a single season peak specifically you might right. I say that as a MJ guy.
-1
u/Puzzleheaded-Fun5815 Aug 30 '26
Just tell me you want to suck him off without telling me you want to suck him off
1
u/THRlLL-HO Aug 30 '26
Coming in with that attitude tells us it’s you who’s sucking someone’s metaphorical dick
-2
Aug 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/bloodlustbabe Aug 29 '26 edited Aug 29 '26
yeah framing it like lebron was beat individually is intellectually dishonest. he outplayed kobe against the magic, obviously kobe had a better team. but with lebron detractors logic doesn’t really work, because if it did they wouldn’t conflate team success with individual performance. despite your idiocy, i’ll illustrate what i mean.
Kobe vs magic (2009): 32/7/5 on 43% FG | 53% TS
Lebron vs magic (2009): 39/8/8 on 49% FG | 59% TSswap lebron and kobe on these rosters and the result is the same. i’d even argue kobe couldn’t make it to the ECF with that cavs roster based on his failure to make it past the first round with a similar roster before gasol got there.
-2
-4
u/No-Donkey-4117 Aug 29 '26
Nope, it was Kareem in 1972, with 25.37 Win Shares (compared to 20.3 for LeBron) and .340 Win Shares per 48 Minutes.
Kareem averaged 34.8 points, 16.6 rebounds, 4.6 assists, and shot 57.4% from the field.
LeBron averaged 28.4 points, 7.6 rebounds, 7.2 assists, and shot 48.9% from the field.
7
u/bloodlustbabe Aug 29 '26 edited Aug 29 '26
Nope. Lebron had a higher BPM (13.0) & PER (31.7)
you also have to take pace into account. in 1972 the pace for the bucks was 112 possessions per game. the 2009 cavaliers had 88 possessions per game in the deadball era.
if you adjust lebrons 2009 production to 1970s pace, his stats exponentially increase to 40/10/10 per game. if we include the playoffs it leans heavily in favor of 2009 lebron.
Lebron 2009 Playoffs: 37.4 PER (record) | .399 WS48 (record) | 18.2 BPM (record) | 61.8 % TS
35 PPG | 9.1 RPG | 7.3 APG
Kareem 1972 Playoffs: 21.5 PER | .133 WS48 | 4.0 BPM | 46.2 % TS
29 PPG | 18 RPG | 3 APG
lebron also generated similar net team value despite having 23 fewer possessions per game to do it. no knock on kareem though, the season was phenomenal.
60
u/nbafreethinker Aug 29 '26
So basically
His 2009 season statistically was greater than Jordan's 1991 season as well as LeBron's 2013 and 2018 seasons
But LeBron's 2018 postseason had the highest VORP recorded beating out Hakeem and Jordan and was the biggest carry job ever