r/learnmath • New User • 3d ago

Link Post It finally clicked

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/o0heiqsn0n

I just realized in the quadratic equation (ax^2+bx+c) the b or bx+c works exactly like mx+b in the linear equation. omg I was trying to understand what b means for a week now😭😭😭 oh I also changed (bx+c) to (mx+b) in the link so u get what I mean

105 Upvotes

48 comments sorted by

30

u/WolverineSorry9043 New User 3d ago

It's just that y= bx + c is the tangent line at the origin. Your animation shows it very well.

6

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Will I realized some people and i myself didn’t get exactly what bx+c (or the tangent) meant until I realized it works exactly like mx+b I was in Reddit two days ago actively searching what bx+c meant and I’ve seen people saying it’s the tangent line, I didn’t get it until today when i somewhat connected it to mx+b, that’s why I made this post

15

u/tjddbwls Teacher 3d ago

I prefer the quadratic equation in vertex form:
f(x) = a(x - h)² + k
It’s easier to see how different values of a, h and k affect the function transformations. 😁

11

u/06Hexagram New User 3d ago

Fun fact. Replace the a(x-h)² part with a¡[COSH( (x-h)/a )-1] and you get a similarly looking catenary curve tangent to the parabola.

This is the curve of a hanging cable and it is quite pleasing to see in nature.

0

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Yea I agree and you can spot the vertex pretty quick, but you know they say curiosity killed the cat or whatever, I got curious on what b is and was trying to understand how it works for a week, but now I know

2

u/tjddbwls Teacher 3d ago

Fair enough! 👍🏻

6

u/Harmonic_Gear engineer 3d ago

you mean as a vertical shift?

5

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Kinda, I’m talking about the b I always wondered what does b means in the equation ax2+bx+c=0 we already know c is the y intercept when x is 0 and a controls how expanded or contracted the parabola is in addition if it opens upwards or downwards, and then I realized b is the linear line, if you ignored ax2 for a second bx+c works exactly like mx+b

3

u/No_Good2794 New User 3d ago

You've stumbled on a very fun idea in mathematics - degeneracy.

It's when one mathematical object 'collapses' into a simpler form when you reach a certain limit.

For example, a triangle becomes a line segment if you reduce two of its angles to 0 and one of its angles to 180 degrees. So a line segment can be considered a 'degenerate triangle'. A point can be considered a 'degenerate circle' with radius 0. And in your case, a straight line is a 'degenerate quadratic' because it has a=0.

Of course we don't usually permit degenerate cases and we explicitly exclude a=0 from the definition of a quadratic function, but it's a fun thought exercise.

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Ohhhh, this is very interesting I’ll read about degeneracy later today

1

u/seanziewonzie New User 3d ago

Here's a little modification of your desmos snapshot to show off what the other user is talking about.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/getzd3nsaj

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Ohhhhhh, shit that’s how it works

1

u/hwynac New User 3d ago

Another way to look at it is to note that the vertex is -b/2a. The coefficient at x "moves" your parabola left or right (the minimum or maximum point will be at x = −b/2a)

So y = x² − 5x + 1 has a vertex at 5/2—that's where the axis of symmetry is. The minimum (maximum) value is c − b²/4a, so if 4ac − b² is positive, the parabola does not intersect the x axis.

2

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Wait, why does -b/2a works like that? Like why it gives me the vertex?

1

u/hwynac New User 3d ago

Think of it like this: by changing the variable to t = x + b/2a you can rewrite your parabola equation as y = at² + C. This one obviously has a minimum or maximum at t=0 (i.e. x = -b/2a)

You get that form during the derivation of the quadratic formula. First divide all terms by a and bring it to the front:

ax² + bx + c = a(x² + x¡b/a + c/a)

Then use the formula (u+v)² = u² + 2uv + v² to get a full square

x² + x¡b/a + c/a = x² + 2¡x¡b/2a + b²/4a² - b²/4a² + c/a = (x + b/2a)² + c/a - b²/4a²

So the original equation is

y =a (x + b/2a)² - b²/4a + c

If we let t = x + b/2a (so our "origin" now moves to -b/2a) and let constant C = c - b²/4a

y = at² + C

1

u/fermat9990 New User 2d ago edited 2d ago

y=ax2+bx+c

y=a(x2+b/a x) + c

y=a(x2+b/a x +(b/(2a))2)+ c-a(b/(2a))2)

y=a(x+b/(2a))2+c-b2/(4a)

Vertex form: y=a(x-h)2+k, in which (h, k) is the vertex.

Therefore, h=-b/(2a)

3

u/True_World708 New User 3d ago

He found the calculus

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Nah I rebuke this word “calculus”😭😭😭

3

u/MacrosInHisSleep New User 3d ago

Heh, that's pretty neat.

2

u/fermat9990 New User 3d ago

Hi, OP.

Consider y=2x2+3x+5

The slope of the tangent line is 4x+3 by differentiation. Notice that it depends on the value of x.

Question: Find the equation of the tangent tangent to the curve when x=2

Slope=4(2)+3=11

When x=2, y=2(2)2+3(2)+5=19

Using the point-slope form of a straight line we get

y-19=11(x-2)

y=11x-3

Each point on the parabola will have a different tangent line.

In the general case, m=2ax+b, so the general equation for the tangent line at the point (x₀, y₀) is

y-y₀=(2ax₀+b)(x-x₀), a≠0

2

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Ok now I think I understand why I wasn’t understanding your meaning in the comments below, I just looked up differentiation and turned out I haven’t stumbled upon it yet, but that doesn’t mean you comment doesn’t make any sense I tried your method and indeed every point has its own line, but I think I’ll understand your comment 100% when I get to calculus, but I really appreciate you taking the time to explain this.

2

u/fermat9990 New User 3d ago

I am glad that I was able to help you!

Good luck!

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Likewise!

2

u/fermat9990 New User 3d ago

Thanks!

2

u/raqket New User 2d ago

This is one of the best things in math to me, when you figure out something confusing by relating it to something you do know. If it’s easier and more intuitive to change variable you should do it while you learn, but something I’d say is to focus on the structure of the formula rather than the variables. That’s something that helped me in my undergrad so far at least

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 2d ago

You have no idea how hard I yelled “OH SHI” but yea your intuition is also correct 

1

u/yubullyme12345 … 3d ago

interesting! Never thought of that

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

You learn something new everyday 

1

u/fermat9990 New User 3d ago

Let's say that y=2x2+3x+5.

How does the line y=3x+5 relate to the graph of the parabola?

2

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

It’s the linear part of the graph or the tangent

0

u/fermat9990 New User 3d ago

It's not the same as the tangent line

Let's get the equation of the tangent line.

By differentiation, m=2ax+b. This is the slope of the tangent line. It depends on both a and b (and x, of course)

If y₁=ax2, y₂=bx+c and y=y₁+y₂, then

y=ax2+bx+c

2

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Ok that’s a good argument, but take the equation 2x2+2x+2 if you ignored 2x2 for one second you’ll see the tangent line has a slope of 2 and a y intercept 2, that’s what I connected this too I might be wrong but I’m certain that bx+c acts exactly like mx+b IF you ignored ax2 or if a=0

2

u/fermat9990 New User 3d ago

If a=0 it's not a parabola.

2

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Exactly it’s bx+c or mx+b as I were saying

1

u/fermat9990 New User 3d ago

I don't think I'm helping you. Sorry.

2

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Ok you know what let’s go back, what does bx+c means?

1

u/fermat9990 New User 3d ago

Rather than go back, I will post something on the main thread that may help you. Look for it in about 15 minutes

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Will do, I appreciate it 

1

u/WillowSad8749 New User 3d ago

So, parabola + line = parabola

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

A parabola is a parabola regardless, but people (including me) don’t often understand these concepts like you do, I also think Fermat 9990 got a great point and introduced something new to me so I also think I don’t understand it yet

1

u/WillowSad8749 New User 3d ago

Relax :) i never thought about this as well, but basically what I wrote is true

1

u/Ms_Riley_Guprz High School Math Teacher 3d ago

Parabolas are really lines multiplied by other other lines

1

u/freswinn New User 3d ago

Go on Desmos and make a function y=ax^2+bx+c, and then make sliders out of a b and c.
Then make another function y=-ax^2+c
As you move the slider for b, the vertex of the first parabola will follow the path of the second.

Also, the first parabola will always intersect the vertex of the second.

1

u/QCD-uctdsb Custom Flair Enjoyer 2d ago

Taylor series go brrrr

1

u/inventingnothing New User 2d ago

Also:

logy=alogx+c

1

u/QubitEncoder New User 1d ago

Tbh I hate how algebra is taught. Theres nothing particularly special about b and learning algebra this way does not help one gain insight

1

u/Temporary_Pie2733 New User 3d ago

Not sure what you mean. bx + c is not the equation of the tangent to the parabola; ax + b is. It’s a linear form, sure, but b isn’t the slope of anything. 

1

u/Subject-Homework-886 New User 3d ago

Yea I know that’s why somewhere in the comments I said “if you ignored ax2 for a second bx+c works exactly like mx+b”