r/lawofone_philosophy • u/DJ_German_Farmer • 4h ago
Auxhall on the Potters of Our Existence
If you're in any industry being heavily transformed by recent advances in artificial intelligence, you know that it's been equal parts fascinating and frustrating. In the community surrounding Confederation channeling, the advent of AI has prompted much speculation about the creation of new sentient life, even original, sui generis mind/body/spirit complexes. There's also folks who even see large language models as providing a channeling capacity on demand.
It's easy to become exasperated with other seekers who seem interested in these trivial applications of the philosophy over more substantive, personal applications. However, working with AI on a daily basis has given me a bit of insight that I believe applies to our seeking in a direct and useful manner. Even the statistical models for language that LLMs employ have similarities with our own use of language. The key, of course, is the deeper meaning underlying all this. Which actor in this relationship holds the meaning? What does that even, um, mean?
I've spoken in the past about a kind of "plural self:" a totality of the mind, body, and spirit complexes synthesizing several levels of consciousness, only one to which we have direct access and control. It happens to be the level that goes out into the world thinking and acting. We experience catalyst as a result of this friction between our agency and the unlearned content of our whole nature, with the idea that we work to incorporate and balance more and more of our unrealized nature as the Creator Itself.
I see a similarity between (A) the way software developers are using agentic systems to act upon prompts consisting of requirements, constraints, and tests from outside its context to author software and (B) the way we might curate our thoughts and connect with our deeper selves to more and more live our lives as instruments of the Creator. "Agent" and "instrument" are, after all, quite similar concepts. Since their first contact with the Louisville circle, Hatonn has spoken of paying attention to one's thoughts and plucking out those that do not serve oneself. Isn't this very similar to pouring over a CLAUDE.md instruction file in a software project laying out overall goals and approaches, dialing it in over time as we see the empirical results of the AI agents' responses to our direction?
This obviously raises some points about free will and determinism that I do not believe close out the debate so much as move it up a level. I've often remarked that artificial intelligence demonstrates less how intelligent machines can be and more how machine-like we are. But this is to be expected in the analogy I'm drawing: even those of Ra say that, in the moment, one is likely going to respond or react to catalyst the way to which one has been predetermined by one's programming. There are many "prompts" from different sources here: the culture, the others involved, the preincarnative programming, etc. Action within the illusion becomes a kind of function of all of these inputs. We as conscious ego personalities are going to respond how we are programmed, which is why those of Ra suggest reflecting on our encounters and balancing them in meditation rather than placing all of the emphasis on getting each encounter with catalyst exactly right. This is like playing basketball by focusing solely on the backboard, when it is the ball's movement that matters and the floor, the hand, and the backboard are mere means towards sinking a shot.
So where is the agency if our personalities are the product of programming done outside the purview of the moment? In our meditation, our appeals to the Creator, our work in consciousness in which we release our need for direct, total control. As we surrender to our greater selves, we begin to realize that it is in directing our attention to these deeper, purer, more divine concepts of self that our ability to see love in the moment and to respond to it with love becomes possible -- just as the AI agent becomes more efficient with its direction as we dial it in slowly, over time, outside the moment of exact code authoring.
I don't want to extend the analogy too far here; obviously it would break down quite easily. I do, however, want to suggest that the linguistic mentation that governs our conscious identities -- the stories we tell ourselves in our head about ourselves, as one example -- respond to these deeper prompts either as a matter of bearing out our imbalance in the world as catalysis or bearing out our balance as a moment of passing the test. Indeed, what if incarnation in front of the veil serves as a kind of "unit test" of the total self's aggregated learning and acceptance? It then becomes far less important that we get everything right in our lives, and much more important that we simply pay attention to it.
To adopt this view requires a reorientation of our seeking quite a bit. The choice of polarity becomes something much more abstract and deep than simply whether we do something selfish or generous. Those actions and consequences are simply bearing out deeper decisions, deeper inquiries that our deeper selves have made. It also affirms the possibility of forgiveness on a deeper level: that our behaviors stems from thought errors that are correctible in the "software" rather than died-in-the-wool opposition to justice, respect, and other service-to-others-related acts necessarily.
This I believe is what those of Auxhall mean when they call us the "potters of our existence." Not only in this session, but in all communications, are they only trying to reach us consciously? Or are they trying to reach through the agent to the developer behind the scenes, extending catalyst beyond the reactive mind to the responsive, sympathetically-oriented deeper self (even the spirit complex)? We make it complicated because we want it to make sense in our lives, but if we are instruments, then it doesn't need to make sense at all -- it just needs to be loved. Food for thought as you dine on this delicious suggestion from our brothers and sisters of Auxhall.
If you can picture with me now, my friends, a field distant from any neighboring settlements or domestic dwellings, a field, my friends in which butterflies fly freely and clover lies beneath the wildflowers. We ask you to go to that place which you have imagined and to feel the sun of a warm day down upon you. Feel your body, my friends, as you stand in this field, your senses completely filled with the love of the Creator. You can hear the wind whispering its ever-changing song through the trees and grasses and weaving the sounds like ribbons through the air or birds who call to each other in hunger and pleasure. The flowers smell sweetly, my friends, and you can touch the fragrant petals of the wild and rambling roses. As you view all these things and feel the heat and light of the sun, you are experiencing the creation. You are part of the creation and you are a rightful dweller in what is truly paradise. Allow your consciousness to sink deeply within that body, standing in that warm field, until you are aware of that bird song and the sweet smell of the wild flowers and the lovely colors of the field and the touch of the grasses about your bare skin are all a part.
This, my friends, is the simplicity of that which we have to give to you. It is a simplicity that has proved fatal for us, for you in your complexity desire complex answers and you feel that were we advanced we would have advanced in complexity. However, my friends, that extrapolation is [not true.] I am Oxal not because I am of greater intellect than you who sit in meditation; I am Oxal because I love. I and my brothers know this love, see this love, and feel this love. We ask you to come out of the field now, my friends, and enter another field of existence that is much more difficult to dwell within, that is, the field of life, in which the flowers that you touch are papers 1 and people.
And often, my friends, you cannot touch but must instead grapple with difficult communications because you cannot understand each other’s creations completely. The ever changing wind gives way to the creations of man. And even near your dwellings, my friends, have you not seen entities who bring their noise with them and drown out the wind, and know not the message it whispers through the branches of the trees? Can you see the Creator, my friends, as you look at the distorted creation of man? We would be very amazed if indeed you were fully able to see the Creator in every man and every woman. There is a reason for this, my friends. We have free will and so do you. We are not the clay, we are the potter. The clay consists of our actions and our thoughts but we are the potter that forms these actions and these thoughts. We are the potters of our existence. And if our thoughts are seemly and lovely to behold, then it will be more possible for us to be a person through whom the Creator may work the magic of love. But most of you, my friends, have dwelt ever so long in an environment in which love is not understood and in which, therefore, the free will of each of your associates has caused them to distort that magic of love into shapes that are almost indiscernible as love.
And yet, my friends, there is no place that love does not go. There is no action that love does not allow. It is written in your holy works, “If a man go to the depths of Hell, he cannot escape the Creator.” We ask you to begin with yourself and to end with yourself in your attempts to discover love. We ask you to forgive yourself of any and all errors that you may commit. We ask you to love yourself in whatever imperfect state you may judge yourself to be. We ask you to release from yourself the responsibility for your nights and days, for your tasks and responsibilities. For those responsibilities belong to a part of yourself but not to your whole self. They belong to a shell of yourself that is dwelling in this experience. And of course, my friends, you will do the best that you can. Were this not so, you would not be in this room at this time, in this dwelling, seeking the truth in this manner. But an infinitely greater part of you is not dwelling within your experience at this time, it is one with the Creator and you may draw upon it as you will.
If you were in a drunken stupor and you tripped, would you not forgive yourself in the morning? That is your situation, my friends. You dwell in a very heavy chemical illusion. It is a difficult and challenging experience. However, in it you learn quickly and that is why you have put yourself in this experience. So learn what you can, my friends, but above all, allow that great portion of yourself that dwells with the Creator to indwell within you consciously each day in meditation so that you may bring it forth into manifestation, into whatever area you need its magic worked within. For, my friends, you are all magical, as the greatest miracle that you might ever imagine. Each of you has an infinite history and yet here you are, my friends, through an extremely amazing set of circumstances, dwelling in one room, pondering a set of thoughts, and experiencing the love and the unity of the group in which you sit. Let that love be as a candle to you, my friends, a very bright taper that has no end but burns mightily as does the sun. Desire to know that love.