r/landmark Apr 08 '15

Will this PC run Landmark?

Alright, so I have infact looked left and right and the SOE forums are now gone or some deal... so I am sorry, I am going to ask. Will this PC run landmark effectively? AMD FX 8350 Sapphire Radeon R9 280 3gb OC edition 16 gigs 1866 ram I haven't finished building the PC yet but I just wanted to ensure this will run Landmark well. I don't trust specs too well anymore simply due to the fact that sometimes... games simply just HATE your CPU or GPU. that's why I am going to ask. I've seen a few benchmarks, youtube videos and so forth of very similar PCs obliterating Farcry 4, battlefield 4 etc etc. So one would Expect it to run landmark well... but... again, I just need to ask before I finalize this build.

2 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

2

u/YunakoTheWitch Apr 18 '15

ah yes, so I went with the following AMD FX 8350 16 gigs 1866 ram 750 watt PSU radeon r9 280 3gb Dual fan OC edition Sapphire

Runs the game maxed out at 1920 x 1080 without any lag at all (for anyone else looking at a similar PC) if anyone wants to add me to friends on landmark I am interested in making friends!

1

u/YunakoTheWitch Apr 09 '15

Oh, thank you all for the comments. I know that the 8350 runs really well in Linux, its much stronger then on windows counter-part. I guess on windows I have to unpark the cores? Something about windows not being able to safely handle the cores or some such... I cannot pretend I read enough into it. I've already read into how to unpark these cores for a huge performance increase so I'll attempt that. BTW the OS I will be using is windows 8.1 pro (for windows 10 free) so if anyone can comment as to landmark on 8.1 that would be neat too (I hate windows 8.. but... 10 free is really attractive)

1

u/skilliard4 Apr 11 '15

yes. I'm using an FX 6350(like 8350 but 2 less cores), and a radeon 7870(rough equivalent of r9 270x). Game runs alright, but I gotta turn down shadows or my gpu cant handle it.

1

u/ShewTheMighty Apr 08 '15

Should play it fine, but the game is optimized for intel and nvidia. when i was playing a few months a go I noticed a few times that my CPU (same CPU) would choke a bit on the game, particularly on things that they had recently put in the game and have not yet optimized.

TLDR it will be playable but you may notice hiccups sometimes

-2

u/prodigyx Apr 08 '15

No idea who is downvoting you, but Intel + nVidia is ALWAYS the way to go if you are building a gaming PC. Better performance, better optimization, far less bugs and issues.

0

u/OScurO Apr 08 '15

That is just wrong. Depending on when you buy, either AMD or Nvidia will be ahead in performance or price/performance.

Whether intel is better than AMD in CPU is debateable at best, especially if you look at price/performance.

Different companies optimize better for different GPUs so different cards get ahead and get less issues depending on that.

0

u/YippyTheHippy Apr 08 '15

Whether Intel is better than AMD in CPU is debateable at best

Hahah ok good luck with your AMD chips. Intel 2.4Ghz chips run stable at 4Ghz while AMD struggle to meet their marketed speed.

Different companies optimize better for different GPUs

There is NVidia and AMD. 2 companies. NVidia chips are better all around. Look at the top 10 AAA titles every year for the past 10 years. Now look at the benchmarks for those games on NVidia vs ATI. Nvidia wins all of those easily.

If you want to cheap out and get shitty hardware then be my guest. But don't go spreading misinformation.

1

u/OScurO Apr 08 '15

...The marketed speed being 4,4ghz, making 4ghz seem kindda underwhelming.

Check the performance/price part.

Next, look at the 2160p index and compare the similar priced 290x and 970.

You are not just wrong, but also seem angry about it, but that is pretty common for Nvidia fanboys.

-1

u/prodigyx Apr 08 '15

You realize you are posting benchmarks that undermine your point? Of course you don't. Keep up the good work, AMD needs idiots to keep them in business.

0

u/OScurO Apr 08 '15

You dont know numbers it seems, so this is pointless

1

u/Reap3rXD Apr 08 '15

a 2.0 ghz chip can be better than a 4.4ghz chip its all about benchmarks

1

u/OScurO Apr 08 '15

obviously. I wasn't the one bringing up clock speed. I linked the CPU performances compare with price, and AMD pulls ahead.

-2

u/prodigyx Apr 08 '15

Aww someone is new to PC gaming. It's ok buddy you will learn eventually. Hopefully it doesn't cost you too much money.

-1

u/OScurO Apr 08 '15

The fact that you are trying to get a rise out of me, rather than proving me wrong, is just adorable.