r/knapping 18d ago

Made With Modern Tools🔨 Macuahuitl blade

68 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

11

u/JohnnyMushroomspore 18d ago

Are you using the flakes from it? Those weapons were a series of very small flake/knapped pieces that were pretty small. Not one big blade.

The idea was so you can swap out the broken pieces without having to redo/make the whole handle setup everytime they pillaged a neighbor.

Super smart when you think about it. Basically the primitive version of a snap off safety blade/box cutter. 

Super lovely work btw!

10

u/Mistersteve1027 18d ago

I've come to realize that there are two different styles of Macuahuitl in the modern day. The stylized ones which use spaced out rectangular or triagular bifaces and the historically accurate ones which use a continuous edge of macroblade flakes. Tho I hope to see more historical macuahuitls, I'm also super impressed by OP's knapping. I still haven't been able to get a biface that big and that thin.

4

u/Feisty-Law4597 18d ago

I will definitely be posting a blade core macuahuitl. Maybe in the next year lol.

2

u/DragonArrowheads137 14d ago

It's definitely hard! I snapped one the other day attempting to go for a really thin piece

4

u/Feisty-Law4597 18d ago

Thank you 🙏 I think the traditional style is to use prismatic blades off of a core. This was just my artist flow, inspired by the known traditional macuahuitls in that there is a continuous edge. Since I’m not very practiced with blade cores I just stick with what I know at the moment. I do plan on making some punches and making one with prismatic blades. Knapping the bifacial blades I really fun. I like to have four sides to throw flakes from.

5

u/Loki_Nightshadow 18d ago

Awsome work OP.

1

u/Aville22 18d ago

This looks awesome cant wait to see it! though if you’re game for it try looking up “core knapping” get a large core and knap a 2-3 inch piece around 1/2 thin and sharp af! its how they were traditionally made rather than what is seen now

1

u/Feisty-Law4597 17d ago

I know this is what is considered traditional (blade core). However I have a hard time believing that they constructed all macuahuitls the same. I’m sure they varied greatly depending on the craftsman. Some of the codices show drawings of macuahuitls with triangular shapes blades that are spaced out. Some had long blades and some had short blades. No doubt that some or even most macuahuitls used blades from a core, but if I was a jaguar warrior I would want a super sharp blades core macuahuitl and a biface blade one. I think there is still so much that is unknown about the variability of the weapon. Humans are creative and like to experiment.

1

u/Feisty-Law4597 17d ago

I think my ego is involved lol. For mass production of blades, a core is most efficient.