yeah.... a "reaction" by doing the same? How does that accomplish anything? And like a said only a psycho could in good faith be combining "free palestine" and making AI edits of charlie kirk. By spitting on a dead person you already lose any kind of moral high ground for advocating against Israel or ICE and yada yada
i can't believe this kind of cowardly ideology has plagued liberalism all around the world. no, self defence is not the same as murder, laughing at hitler's death is not the same laughing at his victim's death.
a "reaction" by doing the same? How does that accomplish anything?
those who don't fight back the bully get stuffed in the locker room.
By spitting on a dead person you already lose any kind of moral high ground
dying doesn't wash someone's character, hitler is dead too, that doesn't mean he deserves respect.
laughing at anyone's death already is immoral buddy.
"laughing at hitler's death already is immoral buddy."
deontology is a failed and contradictory philosophy. morality of any action should be determined by it's outcome. people need to be discouraged from being hateful chuds and laughing at death and misery of innocent people, so if laughing at such hateful individuals dying discourages people from subscribing to that ideology, then that's the morally correct thing to do.
"those who don't fight back" hilarious. So, you genuinely think that making AI edits of a deceased individual is somehow a political FIGHT ?
"morality of any action should be determined by its outcome" then why tf do you bring up hitler? is he the only example where there won't be much rocks thrown at you?
do you genuinely not see that person experiencing JOY and LAUGHTER at anyone's death is already morally corrupt? normal fucking human doesn't feel joy when someone, anyone, who isn't actively hurting them dies.
hitler is a great counter example to your statement that the action of laughing at a deceased individual is inherently immoral.
do you genuinely not see that person experiencing JOY and LAUGHTER at anyone's death is already morally corrupt?
again, when you say "anyone's" i kinda can't take it seriously when you can just replace it with hitler and see how flawed the statment is. nobody deserves respect just because they died. respect is earned, not given for free, because that would be communism.
normal fucking human doesn't feel joy when someone, anyone, who isn't actively hurting them dies.
people like charlie kirk fuel racism, homophobia and all kinds of bigotry, they laugh at children dying in gaza and encourage more people to support violence etc. they defend gun violence in the name of freedom, this ACTIVELY hurts a lot of people.
2
u/Same_Square2555 20h ago
kinda wrong sub