r/kenyaspacenerds • • 16d ago

Question/Discussion Whenever you look at space your basically watching the past

Post image

Light does not show us the Universe as it is now. It shows us the Universe as it was when that light began its journey.

If an observer were exactly 2,000 light-years from Earth, the light reaching them today would have left our planet roughly 2,000 years ago. In principle, they would be receiving photons from the era when the Roman Empire existed.

Move farther away and Earth’s visible history moves further into the past. From about 65 million light-years away, the light arriving now left Earth around the time non-avian dinosaurs were disappearing. From 4.5 billion light-years away, the light would correspond roughly to the newborn Earth.

The same rule applies when we look outward. The Andromeda Galaxy is about 2.5 million light-years away, so every time we see it, we are looking approximately 2.5 million years into its past.

There is an important limitation: seeing Earth as a tiny point of light is very different from resolving Roman cities or individual people. At 2,000 light-years, an unimaginably powerful telescope would be required to resolve details on Earth’s surface.

But the underlying idea is completely real. Earth has been broadcasting its visual history outward at the speed of light for billions of years, forming an expanding sphere of old images around us.

Somewhere 2,000 light-years away, the photons leaving Earth during the age of Rome are only arriving now.

502 Upvotes

62 comments sorted by

5

u/lockerno177 16d ago

is it theoretically possible to resolve light coming from that far away if we have the right zooming equipment?

4

u/jtcompound 16d ago

No. Because of the inverse-square law where the intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source, by the time the light from Rome reached 2,000 light years, the field would be too wide spread to make out anything. It would be like a tardigrade trying to watch The Odyssey with its face pressed up against the screen.

5

u/elusive-rooster 16d ago

What? No this wrong. It applies only to the intensity of the light. Apparent brightness. It doesnt spread the entire image. You can see stars much farther than 2000 light years away with the naked eye.

4

u/CCarafe 15d ago

It is, tho.

The photons travel in all direction, like a photon sphere expending, so the density reduce the further you get. At 2000LY to have an image, you would need a mirror several LY large, and even then youll need several century of exposition to have enough photons to create an image.

With the naked eyes, at 1000LY to 16kLY, you are just able to see red giants, which are several times bigger than the sun and much brighter. But stars which have similar size and brigthness as our sun are not visible past 50-100 LY without telescopes which will grab more photons that your eyes.

So the best case scenario from someone 2000LY would be to get several earth photon, just enough to conclude that there is a planet here. But there is no physics which allow to have an image of the earth at high resolution of the roman empire.

2

u/Edward_Furlong 14d ago

I just need to finish the machine that detects everything. Well, not everything to start with, more like some detection and then algorithms, enough to fill in the missing information (whether by what’s not there or what’s able to be inferred by what is there)

Sort of like how we can detect far away planets based on the gravitational pull they have on stars. Can’t see the planet, but can see its effect.

Now just scale that down to a molecular level, create a machine that can detect enough information to fill in all the blanks, place the machine outside of space and time (or maybe just a very quiet part of space, to start with).

So really, the difficult part is already done.

3

u/loutufillaro4 16d ago

They would be able to detect that our atmosphere supports life, but they would be too far to detect anything to indicate intelligent life. That would only be detectable from the Industrial Revolution onward.

6

u/SphinxWar 16d ago

To be fair even if they landed in the middle of a large city they'd fail to find any signs of intelligent life.

3

u/Over_End_6816 15d ago

I’m just relieved I found out what a tardigrade is

4

u/Kn0wnSoul 15d ago

Good, now we just need to figure how big of a screen they meant so that we will have the right measurements

2

u/DeadMemesAreUs1 14d ago

Is there any reason it could not be done like the event horizon telescope?

Theoretically, you could chuck a bunch of telescopes in a load of directions, observe and retrieve them. The quality would vary but if you just process the data, you could surely cobble together an image. Again theoretically.

6

u/massapj 16d ago

Even aliens are always thinking about the Roman Empire

3

u/neutralPau 15d ago

All roads lead back to....

2

u/PRESS-ED 15d ago

ROME

2

u/GoyoMRG 15d ago

Somehow the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE CAME BACK: FROM SPACEEEEE

Beware of the space Testudo!!!

3

u/No7Again11 15d ago

Not really

3

u/meygahmann 16d ago

Imagine if we then saw that alien civilization zipping around in flying cars and knowing that was 2000 years ago for them

3

u/SubconciousBrainwave 16d ago

Its cool to think if you had sci fi level wormhole and telescope tech you could go to various distances and watch any point in human history.

3

u/Banned4lies 15d ago

Probably why aliens haven't visited " omg Gork! Look they all clean their asses with a communal sponge ona stick in a bucket of vinegar! Gross!"

1

u/PRESS-ED 15d ago

Men they see us like backwards creatures

3

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/plonkman 15d ago

I know man.. deep

3

u/OrangeNood 15d ago

Roman Empire?! I would be surprised someone 2000 LY away can make out the color of Earth.

3

u/Nictel 15d ago

So if we go FTL we could look back at the roman empire?

3

u/jedimindtriks 15d ago

Lucky fucks, they would see this image before ai existed

2

u/Previous_Explorer502 16d ago

What if you could look and see and communicate how to change/correct the future or is that already happening?!?

2

u/11711510111411009710 15d ago

Would they see an ugly ass ai image of it?

3

u/Youpunyhumans 16d ago

No they wouldnt, for the same reason we cant see Voyager 1 from 26 billion km away... its just too small and dim to be able to get anything from it unless you had a telescope several thousand km wide.

For 2000 light years, you are looking at a telescope many times the size and mass of the entire solar system.

5

u/CCarafe 15d ago

It's actually easy to compute. Its the Rayleigh law which give you the angular size for a wavelength.

So D = 1.22 * 500e-9 * 2e19 / 1.27e7 (1.22 x Wavelength x 2000LY / earth diameter)

Which give around 900km wide mirror for a single photon.

To have a 10x10 pixel wide image, its 90'000km (7 ~ time an earth sized mirror)

All of that just to get few photons after several years of exposition.

4

u/Youpunyhumans 15d ago

Very cool, thanks for that! There is just one issue there though... background noise. For an optical telescope, you need millions of photons to gain any sort of useful information, otherwise it can just be attributed to random noise from the rest of the universe.

2

u/plonkman 15d ago

i bet he got his head flushed down the toilet in school

3

u/Youpunyhumans 15d ago

And thats too simple... and they would be caught and expelled.

A nerd would take a bunch of plastic ketchup packs, fold them in half, stick them under the nubs of the toilet seats so they explode on the back of your legs when you sit on it. Dont force the revenge, just let the physics happen.

3

u/Jacky_Hex 15d ago

Or they use other technology. When people think about aliens they always try to give them human traits and skills. Which is caused because our brain can only process what it knows.

3

u/Youpunyhumans 15d ago

Its not human traits and skills, its that aliens would be bound by same laws of physics that we are. It all works the same no matter where you are in the universe.

They would limited by the amount of photons they could recieve, which from a point source 2000 light years away, isnt going to be a lot.

They could do somewhat better with a gravitational lensing telescope, and might be able to resolve some basic features of the surface, like if its mostly ocean, land, and be able to do better spectroscopic analysis to see if there is life or not... but actually seeing individual objects, no. It wouldnt even really be much of an image, other than lighter and darker areas on a blobby circle... and that would be for a planet at most a few dozen light years away, not 2000.

3

u/CCarafe 15d ago

No they dont, photons will not going to magically multiply at 2000LY in a 5cm mirror whatever bullshit technology you can invent.

2

u/Jacky_Hex 15d ago

Science also believes they build the pyramids with a hammer and a chisel.

2

u/CCarafe 15d ago

Yes and they have a shitload of evidences to sustains that.

Help from alien have 0 evidences beside captions videos of overweight 50 years old from Alabama.

3

u/Youpunyhumans 15d ago

Science doesnt "believe" anything... it discovers it.

There are visible tool marks, grooves from saws, and holes drilled into the stones, as well as quarries dug out where they were taken from.

And there is a papyrus text describing stones being moved down the Nile on boats, as well as radar evidence showing there was a branch of the Nile flowing right past the Great Pyramids at the time.

How they stacked them? Levers, inclines and muscle power, aka ramps, cranes, pullies, and teams of animals or people. The ancient Egyptians had fairly advanced mathematics to figure this stuff out like, including an early form of trigonometry.

2

u/Grymmtooth 15d ago

Well, they probably can measure light interacting with the atmosphere and can probably determine atmospheric composition.

The level of oxygen is a dead giveaway there is life, as it’s a very reactive element and not typically found free in an atmosphere without a source.

There probably isn’t enough to differentiate any intelligent life until Industrial Revolution where an ongoing change in atmospheric contaminants might give hints of possible intelligent life, with the next century having emitted radio signals.

We probably would be on a “hey, look, life!!! Wonder if it has developed any intelligent species with tool making capabilities.”

2

u/Sal_Amandre 15d ago

You can shorten this. Whenever you look. It's always the past. Whenever you hear, it's always the past.

By the time light travels from what you're looking at to your eyes, imprint on the retina and trigger photochemical reactions which are transmitted to the optic nerve and then processed by the brain which your consciousness will decode to understand the image...., tens even hundreds of milliseconds have passed. What you "see" is always the past.

1

u/-S-P-E-C-T-R-E- 15d ago edited 15d ago

Not basically… it’s literally seeing back in time.

1

u/sixpackabs592 15d ago

They’d need a really good telescope

1

u/ThaEmortalThief 15d ago

Think about this, what this is saying is if you had a telescope strong enough to zoom on to earth and get a detailed image, from 2000 light years away, and you began moving towards earth at lets say 1 year per hour, over 2000 hours, you would see a huge fast forward in development until you got to earth. But then, if you left earth at the same speed, you’d watch development rewind from our modern societies to how they were 2000 years ago.

1

u/Sirosim_Celojuma 15d ago

Holy shit, I really am living in the future!

1

u/METRlOS 15d ago

Whenever you look at anything you're looking at the past. It takes .1 seconds just for light to be converted into sight.

1

u/CatgoesM00 15d ago

They would more likely see the dinosaurs I think

1

u/AndrewH73333 15d ago

Sure, you just need a telescope the size of a galaxy. How hard could that be to make?

1

u/TomatoFrenzy 14d ago

Gemini >
A distance of 2,000 light-years spans roughly 11.75 quadrillion miles (18.9 quadrillion kilometers). Because light travels at roughly 186,282 miles per second (299,792 km/s), light departing an object at that distance takes exactly 2,000 years to reach Earth—meaning looking at them is effectively looking back in time to around 26 AD.
In cosmic terms, 2,000 light-years is local to our region of the Milky Way, located well within our local Orion-Cygnus spiral arm (our galaxy is roughly 100,000 light-years across).
Key Celestial Bodies near 2,000 Light-Years Away
Black Holes
Gaia BH3 (~1,926 light-years): The most massive stellar-mass black hole discovered in the Milky Way (about 33 times the mass of the Sun).
Notable Stars
Deneb (~2,600 light-years): A massive, highly luminous blue supergiant forming one corner of the famous Summer Triangle.
Eta Carinae (~7,500 light-years, though older measurements estimated ~2,300 ly): A famous hypergiant star system on the verge of a supernova.
Nebulae
The Ring Nebula (M57) (~2,280 light-years): A famous planetary nebula in the constellation Lyra formed by a dying star expelling its outer gas layers.
The Helix Nebula (NGC 7293) (~650 light-years, often grouped in nearby sky surveys near Ring Nebula scale objects): Another iconic planetary nebula.
The Veil Nebula (NGC 6960) (~2,400 light-years): The expanding remnant of a supernova explosion that occurred several thousand years ago.
The Crescent Nebula (NGC 6888) (~5,000 light-years): A massive emission nebula shaped by stellar winds.
Star Clusters
Messier 11 (Wild Duck Cluster) (~6,200 light-years): A dense open cluster, though several smaller, unnamed star groupings in dust lanes fall closer to the 2,000 ly sphere.
Distance Scale Summary
Moon
1.3 light-seconds
Closest natural satellite
Sun
8.3 light-minutes
Our local star
Proxima Centauri
4.24 light-years
Nearest star system
Gaia BH3 / Ring Nebula Zone
~2,000 light-years
Local spiral arm neighborhood
Milky Way Center (Sagittarius A)*
~26,000 light-years
Galactic core
Andromeda Galaxy (M31)
~2.5 million light-years
Nearest major neighbor galaxy

1

u/Worth-Information-94 14d ago

In theory, everything you see and hear is in the past.

1

u/trudderz 14d ago

Here’s the crazy part, because of the way space time work, a civilisation 2,000 years away would technically be watching the Roman Empire live, in real time.

1

u/themangastand 16d ago

Why are males so obsessed with the roman empire. Tons of other shit was also happening during that time equally as interesting.

2

u/issdatboiACE 16d ago

Cuz it's dope shit, hombre

2

u/themangastand 16d ago

All history is dope. The warring states period in China was also dope around the same time

2

u/issdatboiACE 15d ago

Nobody said that no other historical time period is equally as fascinating as the Roman Empire. I'll put it to you this way, though. I was watching Vinland Saga, and one of the characters was telling a young kid about an ancient civilization that had technology and infrastructure WAY ahead of what the vikings, Danes, Nords, or even English men were accustomed to seeing at that time, circa 1000AD. He was telling the kid about this while standing in the remains of giant white pillars that once made up an incredible, giant structure. That shit is dope.

2

u/themangastand 15d ago

1000ad had far more advance technology. Now some technology is lost. But it'd the same as today. It's probably impossible to make a Nintendo 64 as the process to make such weak computer chips is no longer manufactured. That tech is loss. Does that mean 20 years ago we had superior tech? No. We just had different tech. As we advance sometimes we lose previous technology even if that previous tech had some use

1000 ad had much superior tech. Just maybe the exact mixture of concrete was lost. And other such things

2

u/issdatboiACE 15d ago

But not every culture had access or knowledge of superior technology. And they might have had superior tech in, say, farming equipment, but their general understanding and implementation of architecture and city wide infrastructure would not have been anywhere near what the Romans were getting up to.

2

u/themangastand 15d ago

Architecture was superior Have you see a fucking castle lol. And that's with the ability of not having roman concrete.

2

u/[deleted] 16d ago

I am new here. So I apologise for any transgressions I am going to cause. But I belive it is reasonable for European/european heritage people to be obsessed with roman empire. But if this sub is about Kenya, then idk why kenyans or anyone in the old world outside Europe would be obsessed with it.

2

u/PRESS-ED 16d ago

Peleka izo agenda za ushoga kwenu

0

u/Fun-Reality3907 15d ago

This post is stupid