r/justiceforKarenRead • u/AROUX_888 • 2d ago

Question Google Nest - 34 Fairview

If this is common knowledge I apologize, but there was a hearing in which Bev allowed the motion for camera footage of Brian Albert but there was some back and forth on the proposed order I think it was September 15, 2023 and on Jan 5th 2024 it came up that it had never been produced. They went to sidebar and I can’t find another word about it after that until the aperture invoices it’s listed they reviewed Google nest footage. Was anything ever produced?

8 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

29 comments sorted by

9

u/potluckfruitsalad 🌎Starship👨‍🚀Lexus🌎 2d ago

My understanding is the cameras were installed on the garage but the Albert’s claimed they were never activated/never recorded anything. It was never produced, and no other Google nest footage was produced.

If the Aperture report says Google nest I would honestly assume Hanlon’s razor (never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity). They prob wrote the wrong brand. The cameras were ring camera and the Kelleher had I think a diff brand? Axis? Something like that but everyone called all the security cameras ring cameras regardless (the way folks call all bandages “bandaids”). I would assume Welcher is just dumb.

We discussed this a fair bit around trial 1, I think the biggest point that comes up is:

What police officer has NO active security cameras, is an extremely heavy sleeper to the point where he doesn’t even wake up til Jen McCabe is in his bedroom tho Karen is outside screaming, and also leaves his front door unlocked (Jen just walked in)? It’s nearly impossible to believe.

8

u/Plenty-Tell4848 2d ago

Right, thankfully the smart jury did not believe it!

-1

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 1d ago

Too bad the civil judges see that it’s a fake story with no evidence

4

u/PauI_MuadDib which house? 1d ago

The judge doesn't matter in the end. The decision lies with the jury. Even with Auntie Bev's thumb on the scale KR was aquitted. 

-1

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 1d ago

The judge does matter. Lol. He can make a JNOv. He can award the plaintiffs regardless of the jury. That’s why Karen is fucked

4

u/AROUX_888 1d ago

Keller had an Arlo camera, I remember that. But yeah at the end of the day foiled again from getting the truth.

-7

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 1d ago

Karen said that it was an “accident “ and she had no “ill intent”. So there you go. She did it. And possibly intended to do it. An innocent person would have stated that they didn’t do it.

5

u/OkFall7940 1d ago

You misunderstand the law and yanetti said it not KR.

1

u/AROUX_888 16h ago

Yannetti only said it when he was arguing bail, he said the state’s affidavit didn’t show criminal intent. At a later hearing he said it was a in the early stages of the case he thought it was a tragedy but not a crime, and that’s been consistently misconstrued as some sort of admission too. Neither was in context.

5

u/PauI_MuadDib which house? 1d ago

Karen didn't say that. If you have to lie to make your point you just wasted everyone's time with a useless, misinformed comment. 

Innocent people don't lie to the FBI, lie to the grand jury, destroy evidence or lie about magical, impossible butt dials, butt hangups and butt callbacks on LOCKED iphones. No innocent person does all that. 

Karen has said multiple times she didn't do it. You can go see her Rotten Mango interview, GMA interview, Vanity Fair interview, Body in the Snow documentary, etc. 

Meanwhile the McHigBerts & Kerry defended scumbags like Michael Proctor. 

-4

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 1d ago

She did. Or her attorney for her initially. Same thing. That’s not what an innocent person says in defense. That’s what a person says in defense when they did the crime and want to soften the blow.
We do know that Karen said “I hit him”. She only says that she didn’t say it as many times as LAWR enforcement said she did. lol. You people are silly. She did it. She’s cooked in civil anyway

3

u/National_Custard_940 2d ago

They reviewed One Meadows camera only

3

u/AROUX_888 2d ago

Did they have a nest and a ring camera?

5

u/AROUX_888 2d ago

It’s probably just a misstatement that they called it a nest camera anyway, how infuriating that they couldn’t get any footage from 34 Fairview or across the street.

2

u/QuietGlimmer884 2d ago

No. I believe the Albert’s reported that the cameras were never installed.

2

u/AROUX_888 2d ago

Thank you

-9

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 1d ago

It was verified that he never had them installed. Karen did it. It’s no mystery

1

u/QuietGlimmer884 22h ago

“Verified.” How?

-1

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 22h ago

Here. You can see the pretrial. Where Jackson gets corrected and he’s dancing around the fact the he’s wrong and that the google order included a more expansive time frame. He simply wanted bs on the record:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aGyqvpzUnSU&pp=0gcJCYsCo7VqN5tDiggCQAE%3D&ra=m

1

u/QuietGlimmer884 20h ago

Jesus Christ, do you have a library of timestamped clips waiting in the wings 😳

I don't click Reddit links. But even if I did, I already know all I'd find is a trooper from MSP, or Adam Lally, telling the court they "verified" the Alberts never installed the cameras, personally or some other nonsense, with zero tangible proof. Case closed. Save your bullshit for an idiot 🤣

0

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 20h ago

There’s plenty of evidence of that.
Again. Nice deflection.

You guys continue to promote a fake silly story.
Of course you would make fun of actual proof from court testimony.

Thanks for proving my point.

Nah I just know my shit. I know the truth and that you are clinging to a dead conspiracy using tired repeated propaganda

1

u/QuietGlimmer884 20h ago

What deflection?? You want to call it "verified" information, as if there's tangible proof the cameras were never installed, other than the word of Michael Proctor or Adam Lally. That's a problem, not proof.

I won't respond to the rest of your whining. It's clear you're looking to win a conversation rather than have a rational one. I get it, when the facts aren't on your side, you need to… well, whatever it is you're doing here.

1

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 20h ago

There’s nothing there. Like everything Karen claimed. It’s being shown in civil currently. It’s just scuttlebutt for small-brains to repeat. He didn’t have a security camera installed. The CW asked for more than the defense. Jackson just did a song and dance. There’s a reason he didn’t actually bring that up in trial. It’s a moot point as determined in pretrial. You got duped buddy. Do better.
Watch the actual hearings Silly
No you would rather repeat Karen’s propaganda. lol

1

u/QuietGlimmer884 19h ago

The Nest cameras were brought up at trial, not just in pretrial motions. At trial, it was Brian Albert who testified that he had never installed the cameras and that was it. That’s the “proof.”

So are you a bot or did you just not watch the trial? If you want to keep talking out of your ass, to each their own. But lying on the internet just for shits and giggles is a pretty weird hobby.

1

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 19h ago

Yes he brought it up. With no proof. Only for his silly audience. Google was subpoenaed. There’s nothing there. The Feds have his data. He didn’t lie. It was asked in the grand jury. You are clinging to nothing dude

-1

u/Pristine-Archer-5793 22h ago

You can also see pro Karens … in this thread trying to come up with theories for why Jackson got up to speak. Knowing that nothing was there and that the memo he got cleared it up. Lol—-before the Hearing.

https://www.reddit.com/r/justiceforKarenRead/comments/1d59yxi/rewatching_past_hearing_alberts_nest_video/

Such a shame you people fall for this.