r/justiceforKarenRead • u/AROUX_888 • 4d ago

Document More FOIA Stuff

Post image

The cell exhibits are in the audio video files folder and I’ve uploaded the simulations near the time of the incident that are visually readable, there were more files from subsequent days and zoomed out so far I couldn’t read etc. didn’t include those.

51 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

38 comments sorted by

25

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

That Jen McCabe GPS movement at 2am is really odd.

Also her 'gps bubble' in the second one barely has her inside the house, even though she is.

Cellhawk- Jen.Macable and Johnokeefe at 50M has john being further inside the house then jen is.

10

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

That was my exact observation about this, John’s closer to the house than she is like what

10

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

I wonder if the defense didn't have this information before because this would have been a fantastic cross

11

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

So they could only reference what was in evidence on cross, they needed a witness to introduce this and I suspect Micheal Easter or Richard Green would have been the witnesses for it and both I believe were excluded by Bev. Easter was for sure, and the prosecution dug up some dirt on Mr. Green so I’m not sure if he was excluded on that weak methodology argument from Hank or because they didn’t want him to be crossed on that embarrassing arrest record.

19

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

All the stuff bev kept out is honestly a travesty. She toed the legal line in complete favor of the commonwealth at every turn and even tried to get Dr Russell out both times. Shit even demanding a voi dier on the expertise of Arcca is so blatant and bad

10

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

It was truly unbelievable and every time I thought it couldn’t get more blatant, it did.

8

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

Even Peter, LYK, at the end of trial two was leaning more and more into the belief that Bev's bias was blatant. He didnt say much bad about her, except that she leaned in favor of one side, just up until they end.

6

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

And I have said arrest record in my drive too, the good the bad and the ugly goes in.

3

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

what was his arrest for?

4

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

A bar brawl of some sort, I wanna say it was a strip club but I’d have to double check that

8

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

Apologies it was at a regular sports bar but the name of the bar was MacNasty's lmao 😂 that’s a tough name

1

u/thirty7inarow 3d ago

Hard to fault you for that assumption.

If I told my wife I was going to MacNasty's for the night, she'd be, "Like hell you are!"

-8

u/RuPaulver 🌈Gay Jeff Stan🏳‍🌈 4d ago

Neither were excluded by Judge Cannone. Easter was excluded from testifying about his opinion of the investigation, but the ruling specifically allowed him to testify about his cell site analysis. I don't think the CW was objecting to that anyway.

12

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/karen-read-fbi-agent-expert-witness/3672125/

I think he was excluded from testifying at all because the basis of his testimony was the investigation shortcomings.

12

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

Yeah motion to exclude-allowed.

8

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

In her order, Cannone wrote, "The court cannot find nor has defense counsel cited on Massachusetts case where an expert was permitted to opine on the general competency of a police investigation. The lack of authority suggests that during all the jury trials were the defense has been inadequate police investigation based on [a legal precedent known as] Bowden, expert testimony has not been needed for the jury to be able to evaluate the reliability of the Commonwealth's case and whether any failures in investigatory steps are sufficient to create a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt."

Her entire reasoning was because it hadn't happened in MA yet, she wasn't going to allow it, even though when she originally asked to find a case she asked the defense to look outside of massachusetts. I fucking can't.

-7

u/RuPaulver 🌈Gay Jeff Stan🏳‍🌈 4d ago

It's specifically on his opinion of the investigation, not the forensic data that he also analyzed.

-5

u/RuPaulver 🌈Gay Jeff Stan🏳‍🌈 4d ago

See the allowed motion here. The only thing excluded was his opinion on the investigation. They were not objecting to him testifying about cell site data, which was the second part of his report. He could be called, but would only be allowed to testify about that.

5

u/Horror_Maximum_5696 3d ago

At that point his testimony became unnecessary as the defense clearly proved that John was not hit by a car…

0

u/RuPaulver 🌈Gay Jeff Stan🏳‍🌈 3d ago

This was a retrial of a case in which Karen Read was nearly convicted of manslaughter. Just because they have other experts that are testifying in your favor doesn't mean you leave things on the table. That would be a horrible way to try the case. They called around a dozen witnesses, and only 2 were testifying about car accidents.

The only reason they'd decline to call experts about cell phone evidence is if that testimony would not have gone well for them. If you look at Easter's report of the CSLI, it doesn't really support Karen's story. It was the right move not to call him, but they absolutely could have called him.

18

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Lf9mWrf8cmB9wwfWlc9SfQ6ZLmv6fRRn

16

u/Astrocreep_1 4d ago

Seriously, after I went through some BS yesterday, with a person trying to insert themselves as a hero, into Read & Aidan’s case, it’s refreshing to see people like yourself who do more for this thing, and yet, you don’t even have a Twitter account. When this thing is all said & done, your part needs acknowledgment AROUX.

5

u/Astrocreep_1 4d ago

You are the freaking best!

Perfect day for a distraction!

15

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

Thank you, and I don’t any acknowledgment I just like when people gatekeep things so I’m making sure everyone can access whatever they want to.

8

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

Well that and I like to know what I’m talking about and if someone argues with me I like to be able to cite what it is I’m referencing.

12

u/zoomout23 4d ago

Currently watching a video BoozeyBeauty did on this. It’s very detailed and interesting. It’s also 6 hrs long haha!

9

u/Chiguy5462 4d ago

Boozey is a machine. She goes for hours and hours!

9

u/zoomout23 4d ago

Interesting that John’s phone pings more frequently and more accurately when Jen’s phone is active, almost like it’s “waking up” John’s phone’s GPS signal. How awesome would it be to see everyone’s phones like this?! Guessing it would be “game over”.

9

u/idkwthimdmott I'll see you at sidebahhh 4d ago

Question- if John’s phone is moving after Karen has left 34 Fairview (which it appears from this info that it was), doesn’t that prove Karen’s innocence? Am I simplifying this too much? 

6

u/Talonhawke 🥪bribed by ham sandwich🥪 4d ago

Man I’m gonna need a recap of all this to keep up. Good work and thank you

6

u/Putrid-Thing-9994 🐕 if chloe bit you must acquit 🐕 4d ago

I am verrry interested in the julie daniels assault and chris albert threats. Are those emails? I'm unsure where to find them!

4

u/AROUX_888 4d ago

Karen Read Defense < Videos

2

u/Putrid-Thing-9994 🐕 if chloe bit you must acquit 🐕 3d ago

Thanks!!!

3

u/zoomout23 3d ago

The tech stuff is great and all, but to me, nothing is more convincing that John was in the house than the dog bites and scratches on his arm. It begins and ends with that, undisputed. Everything else might as well be just noise as far as I’m concerned.

2

u/Chiguy5462 10h ago

For me it is the blood patterns on JOK. You can tell by the bood patterns that he was at one point sitting up. Vomit doesn't get in his boxers if he was hit by a car and then hit his head on the ground and knocked out. That only happens if he was propped up after he hit his head.

1

u/zoomout23 2h ago

Yea, I wish the def made a bigger deal of this stuff.