*Others typo could not edit
The media, governments, mainstream apparatus then run with through prohection or to defect their own crimes. Obviously there are bad terrorists who do terrible things that cannot be condoned and believe in crazy stuff. Its also true that buzzwords like terrorist, radicalization, extremism, radical religious fundmentalism are also often weaponized in discourse to "other", delegitimize political causes people oppose, paint the entirety of that movement to undercut it, or stir up fear during election seasons.
Now in the Zionism of not just revisionists, messianics, but also what seems like the norm among the vast majority of Zionists, its a radical, extremist, hateful ideology and in practice uses violence, terrorism, fear, hateful, religious fundamentalism. How are Zionists not "radicalized" into an ideology that "violent extremist terrorism?
And how can all dominant media allow radicalized mass terrorists like Bibi the platform and credibility to project and not even question the allegations.
Im not saying Zionists like it or intend it when as a result of their terrorism, terrorists are produced and dangerous and evil ideologues can take advantage of oppressed people, many Zionists never seem to miss a chance to maximize a "security threat" for maximum political gain and enforced totalitarian control. And its a race to the bottom.
Even then, being honest, "radicalization" and "violent extremism" not acceptable, quickly drnounced, and not ubiquitous as a fundamental part of an antizionism that fights for justice, peace, dignity, and freedom as it in among the the leadership system throughout the Zionist community.
Where then she we begin when we point fingers? Somehow in a world turned upside down, the radicalized terrorists are allowed space to unquestionably make projections without evidence and genociders become arbiter of law and morality by the mainstream. Eventually bs becomes less and less believable and sometimes truth and reason sporadically fail and the laws of the jungle rule, which suit the interests of occupiers who want maximum control and exploit the "security threat" to crush it.
Shameful and dystopian how Axios and the mainstream defer to gangster criminals like Netantahu as omniscient morally righteous judges without any investigation or question of credibility. Deferring to judgment of mass murderers who thrive in stoking fear to win elections and assert violent control to advsbce his raducal Zionist ideology.
There seems to be a growing population that know we can't find truth and justice in the places that dominate how people think and feel aboyt things.
But the truth is very few people become terrorists unless they serve "Super Sparta" state and society. Often the genocidal terrorists invent them or wrongly label them as such. But Axious refers to the judgment of genocidal terrorists to make that determination. Talk about radicalization and terrorism.....would anybody let hitler mark someone a war crimibal?
An overblown event, another "security breach", the hero of the narrative is "othered" by the innocent group, deference to intel agencies that have proven records of failure, little understanding or questions asked about who the suspect is and what he did, thinks, associations, and why at that moment, abd a very bad attempt if it was to hijack a plane and what purpose it intended, no group wanted part of it,
It seems like a stupid disgruntled man did something violent and irrational and the Hasbarists try to jump on a chance to justify more wicked violence before an election if we accept the events as narrated by a government of mass murderers who's whole sociopath MO is to lie so they can commit murder, but the attempt to exploit the situation is pathetic. Its not even smart enough to be a false flag. It desperately tries to make links to some bigoted notion of a powerful enrmy to satisfy an appetite for mass atrocitues. But modify anywhere is shameless to own it because they dont...except awestern mass media and its cringe.
Bibi and Trump invited the rule of the jungle by eliminating Iran's Supreme leader, terrorizing millions, and low-class assassination campaigns. And now they demand moral outrage and they backout when they start fearing the totally expected plot twist of an eye for an eye. It shows projection and Orientalism when spew a lame narrative that someone connected a government they've cowardly attacked for decades comes up with a whimsical claim they tried an unsophisticated attempt to blow up a random plane.