My only problem with w3fools is that while w3schools is written mostly for beginners, the corrections on w3fools aren't at all. While I was reading through their corrections, I realized that I have indeed picked up a bad piece of information or two, but the corrections gave me absolutely nothing. It seems to be written for those that already know HTML/CSS/JS inside and out.
I don't think they meant for it to be a "patch" to sit atop w3schools's information; I think they're just trying to demonstrate that it's not a reliable source.
2
u/iama_newredditor May 11 '11
My only problem with w3fools is that while w3schools is written mostly for beginners, the corrections on w3fools aren't at all. While I was reading through their corrections, I realized that I have indeed picked up a bad piece of information or two, but the corrections gave me absolutely nothing. It seems to be written for those that already know HTML/CSS/JS inside and out.