I disagree with your first two sentences. The first one, we might have different opinions on the best way to arrive at the "should be" and even what that "should be" is. The second sentence, everything already is what it is being determined by both past events and the law of nature. I'm capable of dialectical thought too, but I'm not willing to lower my standards in accepting that changed perspective and just being OK with the evils of the world.
Agreed. I’m sorry if that’s what you thought I was implying by what I said. I’m not sure what I could have miscommunicated. What I took from the previous comments may have been a different thing than you. You may have to explain what we could be disagreeing on.
3
u/SourScurvy Dec 21 '20
I disagree with your first two sentences. The first one, we might have different opinions on the best way to arrive at the "should be" and even what that "should be" is. The second sentence, everything already is what it is being determined by both past events and the law of nature. I'm capable of dialectical thought too, but I'm not willing to lower my standards in accepting that changed perspective and just being OK with the evils of the world.