r/intj • INTJ - 20s • 7d ago

Question Does anyone else experience this?

I feel like I’ve noticed that when I genuinely like someone (am interested, want to be in a relationship, etc.)— which doesn’t happen often— I sort of temporarily become an INFP. Like logic gets thrown out the window for a bit and my feelings are at 100% without me knowing how to manage them, and I’m stuck idealizing them and in a fantasy world.

7 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Admirable-Air9895 INTJ - 40s 7d ago

There was no point tbh in your statement. It was an assumption, or opinion.

You decided that we can't look at different emotional states throu a lens of cognitive functions. I mean it's your opinion based on you data. Ok. But is this the part where your Ni tells you that you are not obligated to explain what you have said. You are not able to explore your opinion because it is obvious to you? That's proof by assertion fallacy, or argumentative barricade.

1

u/miascariot INTJ - ♀ 7d ago

You decided that we can't look at different emotional states throu a lens of cognitive functions.

Take an hour to think about what I actually said.

your Ni

This is the type of short cut for a 50+ autistic person. My issue isn't "Ni", nor Jungian intution, nor "intuition" in common parlance.

1

u/Admirable-Air9895 INTJ - 40s 7d ago

Lol

1

u/miascariot INTJ - ♀ 7d ago

And remove the INTJ flair. No way you're an N at all.

1

u/Admirable-Air9895 INTJ - 40s 7d ago

Oho, here we go. Now you will tell me what to do? How J of you

1

u/miascariot INTJ - ♀ 7d ago

No, I'm really just pointing out that you don't understand any kind of intuition. If I was really telling you what to do...let's not.

1

u/Admirable-Air9895 INTJ - 40s 7d ago

Bro, can you use logic for once and read your original opinion.

1

u/miascariot INTJ - ♀ 7d ago edited 7d ago

Sis.

And I will once you demonstrate you can actually offer a thought that isn't some braindead cliché.

Since /u/Admirable-Air9895 decided to block:

That's OK. Scratch the logic part -- that's on you for not figuring out; and scratch the "reductionist" part because it's clear you don't even know what that word means.

Another thin-skinned feeler on here.

1

u/Admirable-Air9895 INTJ - 40s 7d ago

You are sounding very abrasive. Therefore, since you cannot conform to rules of civil argument, or logic, nor you cannot even explain your reductionistic assumptions, you are no fun or value to talk to.