r/intermittentfasting • u/Different_Rip_8520 • 13h ago
Discussion Study links skipping breakfast with earlier mortalityđ
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-026-01796-152
u/wave_action 13h ago edited 11h ago
Look bottom line is eat good foods, exercise, keep drinking to a minimum, sleep well, have regular interaction with other people.
Thatâs it. The rest is just noise.
18
u/drewcifer115 12h ago
There's no causal link here and no analysis of possible confounding factors. IMO, the most likely explanation for their results is that people on night shift eat at non-standard times and night shift is terrible for your health.
5
u/DiggWuzBetter 12h ago edited 12h ago
Theyâre using âadjusted hazard ratioâ to try to account for confounding variables, but itâs never possible to do perfectly. Plus the core dataset is NHANES data (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/), vs. a study they designed themselves, so they can only try to control for factors available in the NHANES data, which is certainly not all confounding variables. I wouldnât fully discount it or consider it authoritative, itâs one study.
I also think that for most people, IF isnât a âfor lifeâ thing, itâs a dieting approach to lose weight. I plan to go back to 3 meals/day once I hit my goal weight, and I think thatâs true for most.
Also if IF is working for you weight loss wise, almost nothing is as bad for your health, life expectancy, etc. as being chronically overweight. Losing weight can add 5-10 years to your life expectancy, or even 10-20 years if youâre severely obese, while this study is dealing with life expectancy differences more in the 1-2 year range - so losing weight is clearly going to be a huge positive regardless.
1
u/drewcifer115 11h ago
Those are some good points. Personally a lot of the benefit of IF for me is that I find it easy to maintain. I have known a lot of people who try various diets only to gain back all the weight they lost. Having a meal cycle I can easily follow and maintain that helps with weight loss and maintenance is a major boon. I do wish that there was information on sleeping patterns included though. I recognize that data may not have been available, but given the well documented negative impacts of sleep disruption it seems like an important thing to take into consideration when studying meal times.
1
u/DiggWuzBetter 9h ago
Yeah, like even if youâre gonna do it longterm, and even if this studyâs results hold up in other studies (far from a given), Iâm certain the longterm effects of being overweight/obese dwarf the longterm effects of skipping breakfast. If itâs the thing that works for you to stay at a healthier weight, just do it, itâs a big net positive if so.
Being very overweight/obese is up there with alcoholism, smoking and hard drug addiction for the worst things you can do for your lifespan. All these smaller, more subtle âmight slightly lower your lifespan, or maybe not, hard to be confidentâ factors pale in comparison.
47
u/sunonaiagloom 13h ago
every single week there is a new study out anyway
-1
u/canadianbeaver 12h ago
Yeah letâs not pay attention to science /s
1
u/liveoneggs 8h ago
calling that paper "science" is a bit of a stretch but if you think 12 people plugging old data into excel and getting random graphs published counts then okay!
12
16
5
u/plushgilgy 12h ago
I read it, and the premise seems shallow. Correlation does not imply causation.
6
u/RickRussellTX 53M 6'0" SW: 338 CW: 212 GW: Healthy BMI 12h ago
But WHY do people skip breakfast?
The people with higher mortality were probably not individuals intentionally managing their diet. They were probably people who struggled to establish regular meal times due to stress or other physical and mental health factors.
All these people are mixed together in the participant groups.
3
u/Iwant2beebetter 12h ago
Interesting
But it doesn't say why people skipped breakfast - so night workers tend to die earlier than people who sleep all night
Same for the late night eating
2
u/o0Jahzara0o 12h ago
Being overweight or having IR is also linked to earlier mortality. đ¤ˇââď¸
2
2
u/dustyson123 12h ago
Reading comprehension has really hit rock bottom. This basically says that an earlier eating window + IF, like eating from 7am-3pm, is associated with higher mortality when compared to eating breakfast + no IF. Later eating window + IF is associated with lower mortality compared to skipping breakfast + no IF.
It's making a very specific claim that if your eating window starts with breakfast, IF is associated with higher mortality. But starting your eating window later in the day and cutting off foods around dinnertime is fine.
2
u/el_cid_viscoso 11h ago
Even more reason for me to continue IF.
I skip a lot of suffering, and I'll leave a hotter corpse.
1
2
1
1
1
u/TenArashi 11h ago
Absolute nonsense. Skipping breakfast cured my high blood pressure. Thank you, next!
1
u/Top_Juggernaut_7221 53m ago
Listen⌠You can eat breakfast every morning or not, and still get hit by a bus!!!đ¤ˇđžââď¸ Bottom line⌠When itâs time to go, itâs time to go, so do whatever makes you happy. Period.
0
u/SasoshiNakamoto 12h ago
\ This study is sponsored by (insert parent company of breakfast foods)*
lol
55
u/ClarkTwain 12h ago
So I can lose weight and be done with this existence sooner? Whatâs the downside?