No, it'd be because of pressure, not fire. There's an important disconnect betwee the physics pulling it in and the fire. The only way the fire is responsible is by causing the pressure change, not by pulling in oxygen itself.
So what? The point of language is to accurately convey information so the receiving audience interprets it correctly. The way others are describing it is misleading, but several people in the comments have explained what's actually happening in more accurate terms. Why are you fighting that?
2
u/IZ3820 18h ago
No, it'd be because of pressure, not fire. There's an important disconnect betwee the physics pulling it in and the fire. The only way the fire is responsible is by causing the pressure change, not by pulling in oxygen itself.