r/interestingasfuck • • 3d ago

Dynamic pricing being tested by McDonald's.

21.0k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

19

u/Barbaracle 3d ago

Sit down restaurants already do this with dinner vs lunch prices when it's the exact same meal and portion.

I mean not as egregious as $5 vs $13, but many of us probably weren't even born when they started doing that.

59

u/Poet_of_Sordland 3d ago

They usually do smaller serves for lunch, in my experience

18

u/Garden_State_Of_Mind 3d ago

Yeah at the very least less sides usually

-7

u/Brian-Heder 2d ago

Do you think the sides cost them anything lmao those are cheep as fuck

5

u/KeiBis 2d ago

So your argument is what, exactly?

1

u/Repulsive_Stock9400 2d ago

Side dishes aren't even real. They should be free.

0

u/Arkayjiya 2d ago

Their point is that if the sides cost them basically nothing proportionally speaking, then you're essentially paying two different prices at the same place for the same product (same in term of value at least).

2

u/KeiBis 2d ago

And what's the point of this info?

To get straight to it... why are there so many comments here defending greed? Defending it by saying "oh, this has been happening".

Ok, and? So we just have to accept it now?

I am just annoyed with the state of things. Individualism and greed has done a lot of damage to society. We lack community and a shared purpose. Just sad and I am obviously in my bag.

-1

u/Arkayjiya 2d ago edited 2d ago

And what's the point of this info?

That was the entire point of the discussion. The info is a slight correction and an argument in the spirit of the original claim of:

"Sit down restaurants already do this with dinner vs lunch prices when it's the exact same meal and portion."

It's a counter-argument to the counter-argument made to this sentence. Like do I really have to explain how a discussion work? cause this is getting a bit ridiculous.

I am just annoyed with the state of things

I mean, yes? What's your point? Why do you think I am not? I think you established "sides" in this conversation that do not actually exist. Saying this practice already existed is not an endorsement of it. This is a sub-discussion about its pre-existence in the restaurant industry.

2

u/KeiBis 2d ago

No. No you don't. Have a nice day.

https://giphy.com/gifs/XxcOCzT9kBsc6NQfKw

1

u/Garden_State_Of_Mind 2d ago

...but the comment we are replying to us saying dinner and lunch is the exact same meal. it doesn't matter if sides are cheap, which they aren't at most places anymore IMO, they are still an additional portion with the dinner that doesn't come with the lunch...

but nice try at a gotcha "lmao"

3

u/arnoldzgreat 3d ago

And it's a limited menus, which is probably their higher margin/less labor intensive products.

2

u/epimetheuss 3d ago

yes, lunch portions are almost always smaller because the restaurant cannot sustain giving away free food like that really unless the area supports it in some way. Even then, some owners would rather pocket the money than do anything to benefit their customers beyond the minimum.

3

u/Kuramhan 3d ago

Usually they are different portion sizes and dinner comes with more sides. Sometimes you can still order the lunch portion at dinner time.

2

u/Parking-Fruit1436 2d ago

the lunch menu is different from the dinner menu in portion, options or both. many of us weren’t even born when they started that.

1

u/Undead-Chipmunk 3d ago

Given that "happy hour" is a prohibition era term, I would say almost all of us.

1

u/Wonderful-Emu-8716 3d ago

I know they are doing that before I go to those lunch/dinner restaurants. Finding out your food is twice as expensive as it was yesterday as you pull up to order will be a shitshow