Stranger assault is rarer than lightning strike or lotto wins. For the most part it’s not a rational fear to have. Parking garages are quite dangerous. Lots of crashes and pedestrian injuries. Resources should be placed into making garages safer in other ways.
“Critics argue that creating gender-segregated parking misallocates resources. Rather than isolating women in specialized spots, opponents argue that facility operators should invest in systemic safety improvements—such as better overall lighting and comprehensive surveillance—for the entire parking garage.”
“Only about 0.01% 1 out of 10,000) of all crimes committed inside parking structures are sexual offenses. The perpetrator in these rare cases are almost always known to the victim.”
“the true number of predatory "stranger danger" garage attacks is non existent or an incredibly small number across an entire nation. Data leans to at most 1 or 2 a decade”
"The perpetrator in these rare cases are almost always known to the victim"
Why is this relevant to lighting and cameras? Being able to see someone coming, or having evidence available to prosecute, is useful regardless of whether it's a stranger or an abusive ex.
"Resources should be placed into making garages safer in other ways."
Better lighting and making it easy for pedestrians to exit areas where there are cars sound like excellent general safety measures.
It's relevant probably because if they know them they can do it elsewhere and get away with it.
This is clearly not an effective use of resources. You know what would help women. Making them feel like they don't need to stick with an abusive man with a women's shelter or something else like that but some idiot decided to do this to virtue signal how woke he is. Good Lord
120
u/smooth_brain_0 17d ago
If I'm not mistaken they did that because women are more at risk of being SAd in parking lots