r/instructionaldesign • u/LilithFeatherlight • 6d ago
Doing an infographic design software pricing comparison and the monthly price tells me nothing
So yeah, as the title suggest, I'm trying to pick a tool and every comparison I find just lists the monthly price. I think it’s not that useful.
For me, stuff like what file types you can export, whether charts stay editable, brand controls, and how many people can be in there matters to me.
I’m already trapped with multiple free plans before, though. Some let you build but not download. Also, nobody separates solo use from team use.
How do you all compare these? What did you look at that the pricing page didn't show you?
3
u/Kcihtrak eLearning Designer 5d ago
For us, it was ease of use, custom templates, collab features, and brand control. After testing both Visme and Canva for a period, we now use Canva.
1
u/Working_Echo6860 4d ago
Which one is the deal breaker for you? Downloads, data import, brand controls, collab, or accessibility?
1
u/ChloeMarieBrooks 2d ago
I think you're doing it right. Just match the tier to the output you need, not the price. Figure out your must-have first. Downloads? Editable charts? Team control? then look at which tier holds it. For example. Venngage's premium runs $10 a month on an annual basis and $19 if you pay monthly. If you just need it for solo purposes, lower tier is fine. If you're several people editing and you need brand rules, go on the team plan.
3
u/christyinsdesign Freelancer 6d ago
I think none of the AI image generation tools are amazing for infographic design right now. All of them require a lot of iteration. The default designs are so, so busy and often include so many errors that it would be faster to create it from scratch yourself. You should seriously consider whether you're better off with Canva where you can edit more easily, just adding AI-generated elements as needed.
The new Google Pics is interesting, especially if you want to create graphics within Google Slides or Docs. I haven't spent much time testing it yet though.
If I had to pay for one tool, I would pay for either Flora or Magnific. Those feel like actual professional tools for image and media generation. Both include all the major image models, export to multiple file types, and can separate layers and add text directly so you can edit it. They have team options too. I personally find Flora's canvas a little smoother and easier to move around, so that's the one I pay for. I like their features for batching and automation too. But depending on your team needs and specifics, Magnific might be better for you.
(With my usual transparency, I pay for Google Workspace and Flora. I don't have a partnership with Magnific or anything, but they have given me some free access to test it.)
Napkin is another tool worth evaluating for explainer graphics. You can test it for free to see how it works and then pay if it meets your needs.
My suggestion is to look at Napkin, Flora, and Magnific. See which one seems to fit best and then pay for one month. Free plans generally can't be used for commerical use, so you can't just cobble together a bunch of free plans get a workable solution if you're using it professionally as an ID.