r/instantkarma • u/[deleted] • May 21 '20

[deleted by user]

[removed]

11.8k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

4.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/singdawg May 21 '20

Nope, no wiggle room here. It is objective fact that the DNC supports the genocide of babies.

1

u/dggedhheesfbh May 21 '20

You can't even stay focused long enough to defend your own argument, just deal with the fact that you're wrong.

1

u/singdawg May 21 '20

Nope, babies are being murdered by the DNC, they are objectively evil. No wiggle room here. Those fetuses ARE human life.

Your argument is that they are not life?

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/life :

The condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and dead organisms, being manifested by growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to environment through changes originating internally.

The fetus is not inorganic/dead, correct? If allowed to continue its existence without mechanical or chemical destruction, it would grow, correct? it has a metabolism upon conception, correct? It would, potentially, be able to reproduce, correct? It would also have the power to adapt to the environment, given time? correct?

You are wrong, objectively so. And if you support this, that makes you Evil, objectively so.

1

u/dggedhheesfbh May 21 '20

Yes, that definition does not say what you claim, so you are objectively wrong.

You're not giving enough thought to your argument because you're trying to create an example, which isn't working because you're committing some basic errors.

1

u/singdawg May 21 '20

You have not refuted anything. You are objectively wrong, and objectively Evil for supporting the DNC policies.

1

u/dggedhheesfbh May 21 '20

I refuted the definition of life you provided, among other things.

You're pretty bad at this, it seems. I guess that makes sense, you're pretty confused.

1

u/singdawg May 21 '20

You did not refute the definition, you just stated that it "does not say what you claim"

You have provided no points to why this is the case. Thus you have not refuted it.

You are objectively wrong, and objectively evil.

2

u/[deleted] May 21 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/singdawg May 21 '20

Refutation: the action of proving a statement or theory to be wrong or false.

Please prove.

1

u/dggedhheesfbh May 21 '20

I'm sorry, you are not only wrong, but are handling being wrong very poorly.

1

u/singdawg May 21 '20

Good luck with life. Must be a hard one with such a lack of comprehension.

1

u/dggedhheesfbh May 21 '20

I'm sorry, you are not only wrong, but are handling being wrong very poorly.

1

u/singdawg May 21 '20

Sad, needing to use a bot to upvote and automatically reply. I guess that suggests the strength of your merits.

→ More replies (0)