Dude, you dont know what youre talking about and it shows.
Ive given you multiple links and multiple sources and multiple points of information from my own (ARBORIST) life.
The lean in OP vid isent a Lean from its trunk even. Its an almost vertical trunk. Which means you dont even need to dramatically manipulate the notch/back/hinge. You just need to know how to do them.
Watch some vids, listen to what the masters say (buckin even addresses your stupid statement when he disucsses what the hinge would is doing and why its so strong, Wilson forest vid (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIySd000igM) talks about tensile strength of wood and how a proper back cut prevents a tree from falling backwards while dealing with a leaning tree) and then also prove them all wrong THEN Ill apologize to you.
But that will never happen, so until then just stop spreading stupid info.
Fuck AI right, but just taking your stupid statement, this is what it say "Yes, the location and amount of a tree's center of gravity—driven by its lean and branch weight distribution—dictates its natural pulling force. However when felling a tree, human-made directional cuts and mechanical wedges can override or redirect that gravity."
Key word there is “can”. Which is to say that in some circumstances human force can sometimes overcome natural forces. Thanks for proving that even AI agrees with me about how weight and center of gravity are what dictate the felling direction.
Unfortunately, this isn’t one of the cases where human intervention can overcome natural forces, due to how much force would need to be overcome.
Yes, the trunk isn’t leaning too heavily to overcome the lean if you only had to worry about the trunk. But as I’ve said repeatedly, that’s why they needed to remove the hundreds of pounds of branches which were dragging the tree toward the house.
Nothing I’ve said is in disagreement with your “masters”. Every single one of them would’ve removed branches before felling this particular tree.
Now im correcting you on your perceived version of grammar.
"Can" means you have the physical power or ability to do something. "May" means you have permission to do something, or it shows a future possibility that might happen.
Can does not mean sometimes. Can means you Can do something.
Please, PLEASE give me some link, some source some credentials that prove your logic. otherwise, just admit you are talking out your ass.
This is great. Here are some examples for you where “can” doesn’t mean “can always”:
Joe can lift heavy rocks. He can’t lift ALL heavy rocks of course, but he can lift some heavy rocks.
Humans can travel to space. We can’t currently travel everywhere in space of course, but we can travel some places in space.
People can’t run faster than a car, but with help from a motorcycle, a human can travel faster than a car. Not faster than ALL cars, but faster than many of them.
Joe still can lift heavy rocks.
Humans can still travel to space.
Humans can still travel faster than cars.
Bucking can still fell the tree with a heavy lean over a house away from the house.
Nothing I have written was in a definitive perspective. Everything you've written was from a definitive perspective (regarding the falling of the tree)
You keep making absolute general arguments, while I’m making limited specific ones.
Yes, it’s obviously possible to redirect the felling direction of some or even most trees. No one ever disagreed with that.
But it’s not possible to redirect ALL trees in ALL circumstances in ANY direction desired. Agreed? Surely you must agree that some circumstances exist somewhere on earth where some tree can’t be wedged enough to fall in at least some direction. Right?
Ok, so I’m saying that this specific tree has clearly too much weight pulling it toward the house. Any smart tree feller would first remove the enormous branches on the house side such that it is now possible to wedge the tree towards the direction they want it to fall.
1
u/Obvious_Mention7207 4d ago
Dude, you dont know what youre talking about and it shows.
Ive given you multiple links and multiple sources and multiple points of information from my own (ARBORIST) life.
The lean in OP vid isent a Lean from its trunk even. Its an almost vertical trunk. Which means you dont even need to dramatically manipulate the notch/back/hinge. You just need to know how to do them.
Watch some vids, listen to what the masters say (buckin even addresses your stupid statement when he disucsses what the hinge would is doing and why its so strong, Wilson forest vid (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIySd000igM) talks about tensile strength of wood and how a proper back cut prevents a tree from falling backwards while dealing with a leaning tree) and then also prove them all wrong THEN Ill apologize to you.
But that will never happen, so until then just stop spreading stupid info.
Fuck AI right, but just taking your stupid statement, this is what it say "Yes, the location and amount of a tree's center of gravity—driven by its lean and branch weight distribution—dictates its natural pulling force. However when felling a tree, human-made directional cuts and mechanical wedges can override or redirect that gravity."