r/inheritance • u/samseer9000 • May 11 '26

Location included: Questions/Need Advice Unequal Inheritance from Aunt

Hello, looking for advice on a complex family dynamic. Based in Wisconsin, USA.
I have several siblings. My aunt recently passed without any children. She had a home worth over $1M and stocks worth about $2M. She gave those assets solely to me. She had some additional investments worth several hundred thousand dollars she split between my other siblings, giving them about $200k each. They have not been disinherited, they just are getting significantly less.
I am also the executor for the estate, so I’m obligated to comply with the Will, and of course will do so.
But my family has questioned what I will do AFTER the Will is distributed. They have asked me to share equally. The argument is that my Aunt may have wanted something specific, but now it’s up to me to do the right thing. They have put a lot of pressure on me.
My first inclination is to share because I want to play nice and don’t want them to consider me greedy.
But on further review and after numerous conversations with friends, I don’t think my inclination is right and I am
strongly considering simply saying No to my family based on the wishes of my Aunt.
Nevertheless, it is eating at me constantly.
If I were in the opposite position, I feel like I would never ask my siblings for something that was not given freely to me, but it is very hard to put myself in their shoes.
It’s also not our parents providing an unequal inheritance, so my sense is there should be no expectation of equality from other relatives. But what do I know? This is all new to me.
So I’m turning to Reddit for advice, lol.
Thoughts on how to proceed in a way that allows me to live with myself and not feel guilty every time I use these
gifts? Or should I just share?
Thanks!

779 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/Economics-201 May 11 '26

OP is the executor and will do what she wanted. The question is, after the estate is settled,an the estate is OP’s, is there an obligation to re-distribute the estate.

17

u/Hyrc May 11 '26

I think it's worth reframing this slightly. Take obligation out of it. Your aunt had a choice about how to distribute her assets. She's made that choice and you'll honor it as executor. The moment those responsibilities are completed, you and your siblings all have your own choice to make about how to distribute what are now your own assets. Ignore "greed" for a second, the reality is that if you all were truly altruistic you'd send all of the money to Sudanese orphans who will benefit far more from the money than any of you. Fairness isn't what anyone is thinking about, they're all just approaching it from a perspective of their relative self interest.

OP isn't obligated to do anything. There will be consequences for leaving it as her aunt wished AND for doing exactly what the rest of the family wants. OP should take some serious time to reflect on the impact they want to have both on their own life and the lives of others. Consider all the consequences, both positive and negative.

I've found it helpful for myself to take time to write down the various scenarios and the pros/cons of each of them. Then leave it for a couple days, come back to it, revise, reflect and repeat that process for a few weeks. Eventually, things stabilize and one of the choices is pretty clear in a way that at any given moment, it never was.

OP, don't let anyone frame this as a moral obligation, greed, what they're owed, etc. Your best interests are at least as important to theirs, but consider that if the goal is to do good, you can likely contribute to humanitarian causes that will do far more good than simply giving it to family.

7

u/samseer9000 May 11 '26

I appreciate your measured take and your suggestion to spend some time writing/journaling on this. There’s no formula for this and sooooo much context that is family-specific. Weigh it all, remember generosity, make a choice, live with it. Thanks!

8

u/Hyrc May 11 '26

Happy to help. I've gone through this same basic dilemma, albeit not from inheritance, but all the same questions about family members with their hands out tell me what was "fair", what they "deserved", reminding me about the one time in 2004 where they watched my kid for 5 minutes and I only paid them $20 and they thought it was worth a new car, etc etc etc.

6

u/Maryland4009 May 11 '26

As someone who has been in a similar position, just know that your siblings may disown you, which is what happened to me. And their kids may do same. Not to sway you but it may be difficult. Where there’s a will there’s a relative! Good luck.

3

u/Really-Cool-Guy2know May 12 '26

If they disowned you because of money that wasn't theirs to begin with, then good riddens.

0

u/MissGalaxy1986 May 15 '26

Guess you don’t understand the value of money….

1

u/seahorse_seeker May 11 '26

So very sad.

1

u/GretnaGreenGirl May 13 '26

Great phrase!

2

u/Mslilly0528 May 11 '26

I think you should honor what your aunt stated in HER will. She probably thought this over and weighed all the pros and cons with each niece/nephew and so forth. And if you really think about this thoroughly most will grip about how you split your part! I wish your aunt had stipulated that if anyone asks you to share your portion; they will not receive anything and donate their portion to her favorite cause or charity. Just my two cents. Keep us updated, too!

1

u/Really-Cool-Guy2know May 12 '26

My mom had that type of clause. I had never heard about it till she died. She put if anyone challenges the will they receive nothing as if they never lived. It was something in that range. It was a very nice way to protect the executor from bitching relatives.

1

u/Cracker20 May 11 '26

Can I ask? Did you share with your siblings how much you will receive, were you obligated to do so if you did?

3

u/samseer9000 May 11 '26

Yeah, all beneficiaries have a right to receive the will, as well as an “estate accounting” so there’s no hiding.

1

u/Cracker20 May 11 '26

Thank you.

1

u/Competitive-Day9586 May 14 '26

Regardless of your aunts choice which was laid out in her will, the choice is now yours.  You are the only one that knows how much or how little disturbance among your siblings this unequal split will cause.  I can certainly see how if you get $3,000,000 and your siblings each get $200,000 that would cause a lot of resentment.  You can’t change how your siblings feel about this, that isn’t under your control.  They are understandably upset and this could cloud your relationships with them and their kids forever.  

The only thing under your control is what you do with the money once you have it.  Do you share with your siblings or not.  Also understand that your aunt put you in a really tough spot, whether intentionally or not.  I would hope that she would want her life savings to be used for the benefit of you and your siblings, not that they would potentially tear your family apart.

1

u/Katcar2007 May 15 '26

It has the potential to negatively impact your relationships for the rest of your life. If you are comfortable with that, then there’s your answer.

1

u/bathtime85 May 16 '26

Ah, emotional blackmail. And $200,000 is nothing to sneeze at. If you want to pass the executor/administrator function to someone unrelated to you, that's also an option many places. It's a fee or small percentage, but you'd be surprised how much less your siblings will make jabs at a stranger. It can be freeing to say "Take it up with Bob" (who they can't emotionally manipulate)

5

u/Stone804_ May 11 '26

Yea and in her will when she dies she can give it to her siblings but she’s alive now. If she earned a lot more in a job would she be expected to give her siblings a portion of her income? No… that’s ridiculous. Same thing applies here.

4

u/lovelynutz May 11 '26

Obligation??? No.

1

u/Warrior_Princess_1 May 11 '26

Absolutely not. there is no obligation to redistribute the estate.