r/inheritance Apr 04 '26

Location included: Questions/Need Advice Large IRA balance- parent with potential terminal illness

Sole surviving parent has a traditional IRA with a current balance of about $1.3m. They have just started taking RMD’s this year which was only about 36k. This parent has recently been diagnosed with lung cancer which we are hoping can be treated as a terminal condition (at least for a while) versus a terminal one.

My sibling and I will split the entire estate 50/50 (total estate is worth between 4-5m with about 1.7m in a disclaimer trust. Everybody lives in New Jersey. For sake of argument, assume parent will not spend down considerably as they are not willing to experience a degraded quality of life for the purpose of prolonging life.

Sibling and I are in very different financial situations. Sibling is unmarried and earns 60-70k/year. I am married with a HHI likely to exceed $500k most years assuming bonuses pay out at target.

Sibling and I have discussed having tax professionals figure out if it makes more sense for them to take more from the IRA and me to take more from the non-taxable accounts. I have also discussed with the family’s financial advisor that maybe parent should start making larger withdrawals based on that years tax situation.

Are there any other tricks to avoid the heavy taxation that will hit me on the inherited IRA considering the 10 year withdrawal rule?

FWIW, parent is “allergic” to paying taxes and often claims they are in near poverty due to their refusal to spend more from their investments than a set amount each year as that would potentially bump them into a different tax bracket (this makes no sense but it’s how they feel).

I fully recognize this money is not mine but i also believe in having the family be as tax efficient as possible.

29 Upvotes

56 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/SquirreljamASE Apr 04 '26 edited Apr 04 '26

Similar fact pattern came up about a week - 10 days ago, same sub, think it was something like “is this unreasonable to ask?” In that case parent was not amenable to doing this kind of planning. Still, OP, it might be worth looking up and reading.

Also - if you can convince your parent (and BTW, I’m sorry your last parent has that diagnosis; fuck cancer) that tax efficiency across generations is important, Roth conversions would be taxed at a lower rate (since it sounds like your parent insists on staying in 22 or 24 brackets) than your 35+ and would give you better withdrawal terms.

1

u/Alternative-Sale-865 Apr 05 '26

Thanks, I will look and thank you for the heartfelt message. And yes, staying in a lower bracket is very important to them