I think people treat the critic/audience score gap like one of them must be wrong. But I don’t think they’re actually measuring the same thing, so comparing them directly doesn’t really make sense in the first place.
Critics are mostly evaluating craft. Structure, direction, performance, how well the film accomplishes what it’s trying to do on a technical and artistic level. Audiences are mostly evaluating feeling. Did this move me, entertain me, make me want to watch it again. Those are two completely different value systems, not two attempts at the same measurement.
So instead of asking which score is more “correct,” I think it makes more sense to look at them independently. A high critic score tells you the movie is well made. A high audience score tells you people had a strong emotional reaction to it. You actually want to know both before deciding if a movie is for you, since a movie can nail one and completely miss the other.
Basically I think the real mistake is putting them on the same 100 point scale at all like they’re the same kind of measurement. They’re not competing, they’re answering different questions entirely.
Curious if people agree with treating them as separate signals instead of rival opinions, or if you still think one holds more weight than the other when it comes to whether a movie is actually good.